The OFFICIAL "Which maker do you use?" And General RM Discussion Topic.

In an effort to get things completely back to normal around here, we have to get some of our old stickies back as well. 

So, here we go. Answer the poll. Discuss. Stop repeat threads.

EDIT: Apparently the previous title wasn't descriptive enough...

I use RMXP now... I like to script...

I prefer a healthy dose of 2k3

I am Game Maker's BITCH.

Rpg Maker 2003 is the option I stick with. I alternate Rpg Maker 2000 now and then, just to experiment some events, but that's it. I only use Rpg Maker XP to answer questions.

xp cause of better graphics and options

XP. Because I found the learning curve gentle.

__________________________________
Side note~
I'm the only person alive that thinks RM XP has a gentle learning curve. Chuck Norris tried to use RM XP one time, Chuck Norris is afriad of computers now.

_______________________________
Side note 2 ~
I met Chuck Norris once, now he has a complex.

____________________________
Side note 3~
Chuck Norris is a pussy.

Geno Zero's friend Jovi is a Chuck Norris fan I think.

I'm the only person alive that thinks RM XP has a gentle learning curve. Chuck Norris tried to use RM XP one time, Chuck Norris is afriad of computers now.

I also thinks that... >_>

Then you know what that means, you can kick Chuck Norris' monkey ass too.

I like to use RMXP because there is actually a legal version out, and I like to script. I basicly suck at events.

I like XP if for no other reason than the freedom you get with making resources.

XP, becuase you can make it your own game, nothing other then your own limits can stop you, and you can truely make your own game.

I've been messin around with XP for a few days now, and I'm almost 100 percent sure I'll convert Earthbound. The only thing stopping me is the whole stretching of small graphics issue...

I tend to use XP purely because of the fact i dont like small res and colour depth's. I'm also trying to figure out how to script it so if anyon could help me that would be nice   

I perfer rm2k3's battle system,but i like the flexability of XP

i use Rpg maker 2000 and 2003 and xp

I use RPG Maker 2000 and XP a lot. I don't know why I stay away from 2003, and I don't really like the other Makers out there 'cuz they take more thinking, and I'm too lazy for that.

I used to use 2003 until I got my new computer that can run XP so I use that now.

I like the old school look and feel of 2k, the blocky sprites, the text battles.  I also like how 2k doesn't mangle half my MIDI files.

That said, xp does have a few pros that I can't overlook, like no size limit on sprites or tilesets.  I currently am using xp, but not a day goes by that something about it doesn't anger me. 

Am I the ONLY GM user here?

I like to use XP since you can do alot of different things with scripting, and I find it quite fun.

--GO XP!--
~Tsuta~

Sim rpg maker 95.

I don't want to script a thing in, or ask someone else like a noob.

RPG maker 2003, just for the simple fact there is a side battle system.  other than that xp seems better.

You can force XP to use a sideview system.