Ps3 or xbox 360

:) · January 25, 2007, 12:25:29 AM

Quote from: KalTorak on January 25, 2007, 12:16:33 AM
PS3>360. Why? Halo 3.

this makes no sense

Largo Usagi · January 25, 2007, 01:54:38 AM

Quote from: arrowone on January 25, 2007, 12:14:18 AM
[/fanboy]

i would have supported the PS3 but

it costs to much
has shit multi player

Arrow · January 25, 2007, 02:43:04 AM

You know it has shit multiplayer from experience?

Largo Usagi · January 25, 2007, 06:01:40 AM

one of my friends bought one, i played it, the multi player was shit, as allways in the past single player was great but sony failed on the multi player

also you cant tell any difference between the 2's graphics

and I'm usually 80% of the time all about the multi player

Lord Dante · January 25, 2007, 06:09:26 AM

actually, although i support Wii/360, I think it is too early to judge the PS3. Everybody thought the DS sucked at first, but that was before any good games came out for it. I say we stop arguing until there is more than launch titles out for the PS3.

Largo Usagi · January 25, 2007, 06:13:47 AM

i argue based on history and what is here now,

resistance from what i played had a killer single player but the multi player was lacking, i see those who like single player games buying the ps3 and those who like multi play buying a 360

Lord Dante · January 25, 2007, 06:31:24 AM

i actually think that will eventually be accurate, because the PS3 looks to have mostly RPGs.

Largo Usagi · January 25, 2007, 06:38:49 AM

and the AC series is coming to 360 witch used to be an only ps2 game

but MS failed at getting sqaure enix to multi platform produce, and i bet they lost interest after the FF11 failure

Lord Dante · January 25, 2007, 06:41:41 AM

SE is multi-platforming. Blue Dragon is S.E...

Largo Usagi · January 25, 2007, 07:05:28 AM

0.o i didn't know that, cool, maybe if im lucky ill be able to have FF on my 360

homelesscarl · January 25, 2007, 04:17:21 PM

Wii is still the way to go. I'm tell you, when you see all the games it will have in a year and a half, you'll only need a Wii.

Largo Usagi · January 25, 2007, 04:27:22 PM

i don't ever see the wii having any type of CAL or simaler to CAL events on it, though i kinda want to buy a wii just for zelda, and for the hopes that the next GTA will be out on it and i could slap hoes in the game the same way i do now

ferret522 · January 26, 2007, 04:41:49 AM

WII OWNS ALL
ALL LOOK UP TO THE WII
YOU DO NOT BRAKE THE WII
THE WII BRAKES YOU

how is that for random lol

Snailer · January 26, 2007, 03:29:05 PM

The people from ps3 do guarantee that it will stay for like 10 years
Xbox will get a new one in 2 years already :s

Morrowind · January 27, 2007, 03:46:50 AM

Xbox 360.

Has been proven more powerful.

Largo Usagi · January 27, 2007, 07:35:11 AM

technically yes in reality no, the 360 is more powerful because of how easy it is for the programmers to write efficient code for, because of the ps3's cpu architecture its difficult to archive the same quality even though it could do more

Arrow · January 27, 2007, 07:06:32 PM

This whole conversation is stupid. Do you play the console? No. You play the games. Why argue over platforms and companies? The whole damn business is supposed to be about the games, not who connects to the internet faster, or who can play DVD's the best, or whateve else the fuck. DAMNIT these conversations are such a waste of time. If I was a moderator, I would lock this topic and very one that was like it.

Largo Usagi · January 27, 2007, 07:27:11 PM

Quote from: arrowone on January 27, 2007, 07:06:32 PM
This whole conversation is stupid. Do you play the console? No. You play the games. Why argue over platforms and companies? The whole damn business is supposed to be about the games, not who connects to the internet faster, or who can play DVD's the best, or whateve else the fuck. DAMNIT these conversations are such a waste of time. If I was a moderator, I would lock this topic and very one that was like it.

yes but without competition we wouldn't get top notch product, developers choose based on what will give the best results, thats like saying i would rather watch a movie on VHS than on DVD every one knows that a DVD smokes the VHS

Arrow · January 27, 2007, 08:46:49 PM

I could personally care less which medium it uses. VHS is just fine if you take care of the damn thing. And besides, it doesn't matter how good it looks, it matters how good the movie itself is.

Lord Dante · January 28, 2007, 06:12:55 AM

well, ok, but if its an action or an animation of any sort it does sortof matter...

LinkenX · January 28, 2007, 11:37:14 PM

their all good
depends on your taste and how much money you have
personnaly, I have the wii and I like very much because of the controls

my friend owns an xbox 360 and its not so bad
I've tried the ps3 at those demo stalls in eb games and the graphics look nice
so money wise, xbox 360 is the way to go unless you want ff13 lol

phoenix647 · February 07, 2007, 06:26:46 PM

I want ps3 for 13, but hey who knows, it might let me down like the last FF. But i dont care much for shooters or Halo so i wouldnt have much use for a 360. I'm an rpg guy.

Captain Callahan · February 07, 2007, 07:35:25 PM

I want the PS3 cause it will have Kingdom Hearts 3, FF13 and some more awesome games.
But My bro is getting the Wii and I will have the Ps3 once I get my Job money saved up to get it.

Then I will be set with Fun system and a awesome system.

bulls84 · February 12, 2007, 03:22:11 AM

I have a Wii and don't have a PS3(I am getting one though), but I still think PS3 is the best.

oneray · February 12, 2007, 10:12:54 PM

X box 360: good graphics, great FPS, cheaper, already out with many games, business is secure, on-line better, has great potential, perfect for multiplayer freaks, big game companies (like Square Enix with thier Final Fantasy and Dragon Quest) are also appearing on the 360

PS3: great graphics, no big games, not many games out, expensive, business is not secure (Sony is questioning if they should continue with the gaming business), great potential, free on-line

Wii: Cheap, different, last gen-graphics, expensive for accessories (baton, controller, numchuck, memory card), slower, weaker, childish games, great for family fun, unique

So there you have it. I would choose X Box 360 because I am into tactical shooters and 360 has and will have a huge game library. The Wii may not be that powerfull, but the games and style are different. The Wii experience is unique, fun (especially for you obese boys and girls), and comes at a nice price. If you can't get a 360 because you are brown, chinese, black, or too damn cheap, get the Wii. If you are white or have a job, get them both. PS3 on the other hand seems to be a waste. When you get a Wii or 360 you will get; Brawl, GRAW, Rainbow Six, Zelda, Link, Gears of War and so on. PS3 comes with virtually nothing at its launch day, and the games that are going to come out are not that great. Sure the FF and MGS are great games, but you can get your Tekken when you play Soul Calibur on the 360 and Wii. Some will say they like hands flying around like in Tekken, and some will say they like blades clashing like in Soul Caliber. PS3 should have a made a good first impression and promise more than hardcore silicon hardware. Gaming today is not about how much silicon you can pack in a box, but how special the games are.

I was just wondering though, does the 360 only have 2 controller ports? Would that mean i would have to buy a multi-tap?

Also the guy who said this converstation was stupid, I beg to differ. Games are limited by the system and the company. You can't have the Gear of War expreince on a Wii. You can't have the Red Steel exprience on a PS3. The system does matter for it gives you an idea of what the games are going to be like.

Sry if i am lashing out on you PS3 hommies. I know it is too young to beat but I think Sony gave a bad first impression. If they were serious, you would offered quality in games in the start and not quantaty in silicon.

DANKE AND GOOD NIGHT