Main Menu
  • Welcome to The RPG Maker Resource Kit.

The Great Judging Debate 2014 Edition

Started by yuyu!, March 19, 2014, 11:04:48 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Zylos





yuyu!

The recipe for disaster:

1. People state their opinions
2. People argue in response those opinions
3. People take things personally
4. People make a big deal out of the whole thing
????
Drama.

[Spoiler=My Games and Art]
ℒℴѵℯ❤


My Artwork Thread

The Lhuvia Tales [Current]

Ambassador [Complete]

The Postman [Complete]

The Wyvern [Complete]

Phoenix Wright: Haunted Turnabout [Complete]

Major Arcana [Cancelled]

[/Spoiler]

Gaming Princess Luna

Quote from: Queen yuyubabe on March 21, 2014, 03:03:23 AM
[Spoiler=More Example whee]

Polish:


Visuals - ?/10
Audio - ?/10
Writing - ?/10


Gameplay:


Playability - ?/10
Mechanics - ?/10
Balance - ?/10


Ingenuity


Freshness :mad: - ?/10
Entertainment - ?/10
Direction - ?/10




(I just filled in randomly somewhat suiting stuff. The contents would require further debate, considering if anyone likes this.)
[/Spoiler]
I like this way of judging, you would clearly see, what needs to be better and what is okay. You also see what can have a bit less time next time. ;)
I think an extra point for bugs would be great, because you can say you remove ... points of the project for ... amount of minor bugs/major bugs.

Minor Bug -0.1 per minor bug (infinite items, decision who has no effect, sound bug, map errors [strange looking mapping])
Major Bug -1 per major bug (infinite Event loop, map errors [passable walls], game shut downs)

I know that is again about personal liking and disliking, but that is how judging work after all. ;)
That's why there is not only one judge, that's why there are many. (\s/)

Gracie

Quote from: Octavia on March 21, 2014, 05:59:07 PM
Quote from: Queen yuyubabe on March 21, 2014, 03:03:23 AM
[Spoiler=More Example whee]

Polish:


Visuals - ?/10
Audio - ?/10
Writing - ?/10


Gameplay:


Playability - ?/10
Mechanics - ?/10
Balance - ?/10


Ingenuity


Freshness :mad: - ?/10
Entertainment - ?/10
Direction - ?/10




(I just filled in randomly somewhat suiting stuff. The contents would require further debate, considering if anyone likes this.)
[/Spoiler]
I like this way of judging, you would clearly see, what needs to be better and what is okay. You also see what can have a bit less time next time. ;)
I think an extra point for bugs would be great, because you can say you remove ... points of the project for ... amount of minor bugs/major bugs.

Minor Bug -0.1 per minor bug (infinite items, decision who has no effect, sound bug, map errors [strange looking mapping])
Major Bug -1 per major bug (infinite Event loop, map errors [passable walls], game shut downs)

I know that is again about personal liking and disliking, but that is how judging work after all. ;)
That's why there is not only one judge, that's why there are many. (\s/)

Removing points for bugs is dumb unless they actually affect the game in a bad way. If the bugs arent a problem, ignore them. All GIAW games have bugs because of the time limit. Most judges do not detract points for them unless they're game breaking or adversely effect the experience.