What kind of site allows their members to act like mods?
How about you actually read what was said. Amycha wasn't critizing my game. This rude member was complaining without a good reason in my topic which is SPAM. Amycha was mini moding in my topic.
Alright, well I've read what Amycha19 said, and it was not mini-modding. Firstly, aside from minor housekeeping issues, it is not a moderator's function to comment on the layout of a topic, and you can't accuse someone of mini-modding for doing something moderators don't do. More importantly though, commenting on the attractiveness of a topic is legitimate criticism even if it is not criticism on the game itself. Amycha19 is right that the topic thread is essentially the equivalent of box art in terms of marketing, and just as some people rely on the attractiveness of a game's box to buy the game, some people rely on the attractiveness of a game's topic to decide whether to download. The fact that you don't like that people do that doesn't make it untrue. In other words, Amycha19 was giving feedback on your marketing, which is part of game design. That's not spam and it's not mini-modding either; it's legitimate criticism.
Naturally, you are free to reject her advice if you feel your topic's layout is fine as is, but your disagreement over that doesn't put her criticism out of the realm of legitimacy.
This person is clearly trolling in my topic. Who complains that they have to read a thread? That doesn't make sense.
That was clearly sarcasm. She was likely employing hyperbole as a way of indicating to you that a lot of people, when looking through game topics, are looking for something to capture their attention. No matter how compelling your story or character descriptions, blocks of text typically don't do it for a lot of people.
Who complains about a game having a short introduction? She didn't complained about how it delivered. She complained that the game has an introduction. Most professional games have introductions. This is trolling. Do you job as a mod.
She wasn't complaining that your game has an introduction. She was saying that it makes for a boring teaser video. Again, that is criticism on marketing, and that is part of game design.
I can post my topic anyway I want to unless I'm breaking the rules. I stayed within the rules and posted everything I needed for the topic. No where in your rules state that members who are not mods can act like mods toward other members. You're a mod and don't know your own rules. Unreal.
Yes you can and no you haven't broken any rules. However, I don't see that as taking from her the right to tell you that she finds your design unattractive. It's not as if she's forcing you to change your topic, she is just giving you feedback on marketing. Ignore it or don't, but she's not out of line to give it.
You're trolling and mini moding my damn topic. Get over yourself because you're not fooling me. This has nothing to do with how a woman's speaks. You're rude as hell and trolling. The fact that I don't see you doing this in other threads tell me you are trolling, flaming, and rude.
Even if this is the only thread in which she has ever criticized marketing (about which I have not conducted sufficient research to confirm or deny), that is as consistent with her being satisfied with thread layout in other game topics as it is with her targetting you specifically as an object for her "rudeness." It is also consistent with her stated claim that she is commenting on your topic because she likes the concept and wants the marketing to be better. It is not incontrovertible evidence that she's screwing with you, and given what I've seen of Amycha19's posts in the past, I would find that conduct to be extremely out of character if she was.
To reiterate, I am not saying that you need to follow Amycha19's advice. It's your game and your choice how to market it. If you are happy with your current layout and want to provide a lot of information in your topic, then that's fine; it's your right to organize the topic in whatever way you like. However, Amycha19 did nothing wrong in providing her comments on your marketing, and I think you overreacted.
Finally, a brief comment on your tone: it's not against the rules to respond with profanity or insults, but in my opinion it was unjustified in this instance. In my own experience, rejecting legitimate criticism by attacking the member who gave it generally discourages other people from offering criticism as they don't want to spend time posting if they feel you'll yell at them if they say anything you dislike. Again, I'm not saying it's prohibited or against the rules, just that it is unproductive if you are hoping that other people will comment on your game. It is generally more practical to just politely refuse to follow advice you disagree with.
Discord
Light Style