RMRK is retiring.
Registration is disabled. The site will remain online, but eventually become a read-only archive. More information.

RMRK.net has nothing to do with Blockchains, Cryptocurrency or NFTs. We have been around since the early 2000s, but there is a new group using the RMRK name that deals with those things. We have nothing to do with them.
NFTs are a scam, and if somebody is trying to persuade you to buy or invest in crypto/blockchain/NFT content, please turn them down and save your money. See this video for more information.
It's Official : Scientific proof links Homophobia to repressed Homosexuality

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

********
Hungry
Rep:
Level 96
Mawbeast
2013 Best ArtistParticipant - GIAW 11Secret Santa 2013 ParticipantFor the great victory in the Breakfast War.2012 Best Game Creator (Non-RM Programs)~Bronze - GIAW 9Project of the Month winner for August 2008Project of the Month winner for December 20092011 Best Game Creator (Non RM)Gold - GIAW Halloween
Quote
It is commonly true that those most opposed to gay rights, are those with repressed homosexual urges. Well, surprise, surprise, there is scientific proof that is exactly the case.

An an article in Scientific American shows that of two groups of self-reported heterosexual males (one being homophobic and one non-homophobic), the homophobic group showed a good deal of sexual reponse on a penile plethysmograph that measured their sexual stimulation to three different kinds of pornography.

By the way, the homophobic and non-homophobic criteria were based on answers to a questionnaire. The pornography was male/female, lesbian and male/male. The non-homophobic and homophobic were both stimulated strongly by the first two groups, but the non-homophobic were only slightly stimulated according to the meters, by the gay male porn.

Well, the homophobic group was though, pretty excited by the gay male pornography. In fact, 80% of the homophobic group showed a moderate to definite response to this pornograpy v. 34% for the non-homophobic group. That is an overwhelming difference in reaction between the two groups.

In a second study, homophobic males in a type of game, delivered longer and more intense shocks to individuals they believed were gay males v the shock that non-homophobic males gave to gay males. Both homophobic and non-homophobic males delivered the same type and range of shocks to what they believed were heterosexual males.

There was of course, no actual males, gay or not, being shocked. This was after viewing gay pornography. Obviously the gay pornography set off anger and emotional trauma in the repressed, homophobic males.

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/scientific-proof-homophobia-linked-to-repressed-homosexuality

FCF3a A+ C- D H- M P+ R T W- Z- Sf RLCT a cmn+++ d++ e++ f h+++ iw+++ j+ p sf+
Follow my project: MBlok | Find me on: Bandcamp | Twitter | Patreon

*
Rep:
Level 94
2012 Most Attractive Male MemberSecret Santa 2012 ParticipantProject of the Month winner for June 20092010 Best Counsel
lol @ source

****
Rep:
Level 84
Is a New Zealander
Quote
Obviously the gay pornography set off anger and emotional trauma in the repressed, homophobic males.

How'd they reach this conclusion?
I'm much too lazy to put an actual signature here.

********
Hungry
Rep:
Level 96
Mawbeast
2013 Best ArtistParticipant - GIAW 11Secret Santa 2013 ParticipantFor the great victory in the Breakfast War.2012 Best Game Creator (Non-RM Programs)~Bronze - GIAW 9Project of the Month winner for August 2008Project of the Month winner for December 20092011 Best Game Creator (Non RM)Gold - GIAW Halloween
Pretty sure by their reactions.

FCF3a A+ C- D H- M P+ R T W- Z- Sf RLCT a cmn+++ d++ e++ f h+++ iw+++ j+ p sf+
Follow my project: MBlok | Find me on: Bandcamp | Twitter | Patreon

*
RMRK's dad
Rep:
Level 86
You know, I think its all gonna be okay.
For going the distance for a balanced breakfast.Project of the Month winner for June 2009For being a noted contributor to the RMRK Wiki2013 Best WriterSilver Writing ReviewerSecret Santa 2013 Participant
I believe it.
:tinysmile:

********
Rep:
Level 96
2011 Most Missed Member2010 Zero To Hero
The article seems kinda poorly written, but I'd say I do too.

********
Furry Philosopher
Rep:
Level 94
Rawr?
2013 Best RPG Maker User (Creativity)Gold - GIAW 11 (Hard)Randomizer - GIAW 11Secret Santa 2013 ParticipantFor frequently finding and reporting spam and spam bots2012 Best RPG Maker User (Programming)2012 Best RPG Maker User (Mapping)Secret Santa 2012 ParticipantGold - GIAW 9Project of the Month winner for September 2008For taking a crack at the RMRK Wiki2011 Best RPG Maker User (Programming)2011 Best Veteran2011 Kindest Member2010 Best RPG Maker User (Events)2010 Best RPG Maker User (Story)
Someone test this on Fred Phelps.




*
Rep:
Level 97
2014 Most Unsung Member2014 Best RPG Maker User - Engine2013 Best RPG Maker User (Scripting)2012 Favorite Staff Member2012 Best RPG Maker User (Scripting)2012 Best Member2012 Most Mature MemberSecret Santa 2012 ParticipantProject of the Month winner for July 20092011 Best Veteran2011 Favourite Staff Member2011 Most Mature Member2011 Best RPG Maker User (Scripting)2011 Best Use of Avatar and Signature Space2010 Best RPG Maker User (Scripting)2010 Best Use Of Avatar And Signature Space
Well, the study isn't new - the Scientific American article he is talking about is from last year, the first study from 1996 and the second from 2001. Neither study has been without disagreement (not that that means a lot - if there is a scientific theory without disagreement, I would have trouble believing it was scientific). Both samples seemed pretty small to me though, and in any case, it isn't anymore official than it was before - I am personally more persuaded by the Meier study (also mentioned in the Scientific American article). I don't really find the secret attraction argument all that compelling from a logical standpoint.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2011, 09:13:07 PM by modern algebra »

*
RMRK's dad
Rep:
Level 86
You know, I think its all gonna be okay.
For going the distance for a balanced breakfast.Project of the Month winner for June 2009For being a noted contributor to the RMRK Wiki2013 Best WriterSilver Writing ReviewerSecret Santa 2013 Participant
Okay, how about some anecdotal evidence? I know, hearsay, but I saw this unfold before my very eyes.

When I first jioned RMRK, I was at the Burns Harbor plant of Mittal Steel, working fire/EMS. One of our guys, "Roy", was an Ironclad, card-carrying homophobe. I never knew so much hate speech could come from someone who was so active in his community and church. When we got our permanent shift dispatcher, who was openly gay, Roy damn near quit on the spot. He always used a lot of "f" words when Paul was around...

 We were also on the local VFD, so we had several occasions to mingle with our families. His son was always kinda withdrawn, but I figured it had to do with him being a smaller kid; not the kind of son a proud, macho fireman would want. He seemed to love the kid, though, so I never gave it a second's thought.

Turns out that Mr. "I hate faggots" had not only been seeing numerous men on the side (who also were known in the fire service as homophobes) but he'd aslo been raping his son for the past 14 years.

So, while the research IS old, and the experiment not conducted as cleanly as it should have been, it fits in with a behavioral pattern that I have seen before. Good enough for me.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2011, 09:59:17 PM by EvilM00s »
:tinysmile:

********
Rep:
Level 96
2011 Most Missed Member2010 Zero To Hero

*
Rep:
Level 94
2012 Most Attractive Male MemberSecret Santa 2012 ParticipantProject of the Month winner for June 20092010 Best Counsel
I can't believe so many of you are taking this seriously.

********
Rep:
Level 96
2011 Most Missed Member2010 Zero To Hero
Seriously is a much stronger word than I would use.

*
RMRK's dad
Rep:
Level 86
You know, I think its all gonna be okay.
For going the distance for a balanced breakfast.Project of the Month winner for June 2009For being a noted contributor to the RMRK Wiki2013 Best WriterSilver Writing ReviewerSecret Santa 2013 Participant
Seriously is a much stronger word than I would use.

Are you saying you don't buy into it?
:tinysmile:

**
Rep:
Level 73
Flipping sausage with game and watch is a pastime!
WOW!!!!! That firefighter guy sounds just like that cop guy from boondock saints:/ But yeah, from what i know, apparently homophobes are just afraid that they would end up being gay under certain circumstances and it scares them. I say who cares. Ive never had a problem with gay people, and the ones who are my friends respect me and have never tried to hit on me, so in turn i respect them.

********
Rep:
Level 96
2011 Most Missed Member2010 Zero To Hero
Seriously is a much stronger word than I would use.

Are you saying you don't buy into it?

I'm saying it's an interesting corollary, but that's about all.