If not everyone has the same opportunity, the system doesn't work.
You can't give everyone the same exact opportunities. It can't be that way unless the government makes everyone have the same amount of wealth, and that wouldn't be right.
Everyone still has opportunities to become successful. From the moment you're born, you're given opportunities. Somewhere I have the opportunity to become president, but that won't happen because I have no plans of attempting to becoming the president. Every single person has the opportunities to make something of themselves.
Woah, buddy. Not cool. What if everyone in my field "considered a new career"?
Then I'm sure the government would reconsider giving health care to the men and women who work in your emergency field.
By your own argument, emergency services are essential and should be provided by the gov't. If that is true, gov't funds should go towards fire departments' upkeep and payroll, and thet are not. With the addition of healthcare alone, my salary would be enough to support me and my family of four others.
More government funds SHOULD go to the fire departments' upkeep and payroll. That doesn't mean we need to form a total socialized health care system.
I planned my career around service, as does anyone else in my position. If the gov't was dispensing funds to FD's the way it should, I could afford insurance. I maintain, they are not holding up their end of the deal. And why not?
Again, I agree that they should fund the FD's (assuming you mean fire departments) properly.
While I agree that the gov't should be involved in free enterprise as little as possible, more fuel efficient cars are just good for everyone, and the environment. Isn't that everyone's responsibility?
Global warming isn't a threat to us, real or not.
It's only good for the people who were able to take advantage of the cash for clunkers system. The taxpayers payed for a few people to get better cars just so those people would have to buy less gas. That's ridiculous.
http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/3108/articlesocialismchart.jpg
I've already gone over everything except Department of Transportation.
Department of Transportation is necessary because without it, roads would pose a greater risk to people. It protects people.
Public libraries are still video rental stores for books. There's no reason they shouldn't be owned by private businesses.
I really don't see why providing free healthcare to people is any less essential than keeping them safe from criminals... or ensuring them safety from fire... or etc. etc.
Because criminals, fires, dangerous roads, and terrorists are dangerous. Debt isn't.