Ok. But anything like this is unprovable. religion is unprovable. It is unprovable that we just exist. How do we just exist? If you can tell me that then I'll listen to whatever you have to say.
Yes, unprovable at the moment, so you take the simplest explanation as the most likely. A "god" is not the simpler answer, it's an added, unneeded step. It
may have happened, but it's not the most likely choice.
A BETTER RESPONSE TO THIS WOULD BE, YEH, RELIGION IS UNPROVABLE BUT SO IS SANTA CLAUSE YOU FUCK. You take the most likely explanations.
Saucy, I love you, but you're so predictable. As soon as someone said they were anything but athiest or agnostic, you started in on them.
I take no dogmatic stance on anything, I believe (at the current time) what has evidence in it's surrounds, the god theory has evidence against it, not just lack of. It's not my fault that what I believe happens to put me in the appearance of a stereotypical stance because I believe in them for the right reasons, science is not just another faith I switched to. I would believe in the supernatural if shown evidence of it, as all real atheists would.
*Saucy
Oh Holkeye beat me to it. But he's right.
So arlen... Do you take the agnostic view on the Flying Spaghetti Monster..?
I only respect those who know their religions.
Love it. It's lack of understanding that brings most people to their current religious beliefs...