Rpg Maker 20003 or 2000

[zeldaz]

Hay there what Rpg maker would you use most 2000 or 20003 I thought Rpg maker 2003 was cooler then rpg maker 2000 watcha think

lol

[ChaosSpartan28]

RPG Maker 2003, I dont think anyone uses 2000 anymore.

[zeldaz]

Well there are a couple of forums out that still use and only use 2000 and thats good for some I like rpg maker 2003 and 95 but I hate 2000
lol

[:)]

i'd use 2k3. 2000 is a little to old for me.

[Zeriab]

I have only used 2000 and XP.

[shadowdude]

There is an RPGMaker 20003? thats pretty futuristic aint it?

[Lavata]

I like both 2000 and 2003 and I can not really choose a favorite. They both have their good sides and I enjoy using them both. However, overall, 2003 is better.

[Deliciously_Saucy]

@nets- Spread your bullshit somewhere else... Despite what you think this forum isn't filled with five year olds and "friend of a friend" is laughable.

[Chaezy]

There is an RPGMaker 20003? thats pretty futuristic aint it?

Wow 20003 I havn't even heard of it! but I like 2000 better, it's simpler

[Best-Gammer]

i prefer 2000 becaus if you cant find battle charas and have hard times usingn 2003 command's...2000 is the way to go not to mention the chara downloads such as   


Rpg Maker 2000 RTP 1.0 (Required for 2000)
Size: 11.4 mb Author: Don Miguel
Description: The run time package that contains all the resources for RM2000.

Rpg Maker 2000 RTP 1.32
Size: 7.22 mb Author: Don Miguel
Description: An additional run time package that contains extra resources for RM2000


really saves the problem im massive imports unlike 2003.....

[Polraudio]

i love 2003 its way better that 2000 in every way

[Knight Rider]

2k3, hands down (even though i have 2k)

[Lavata]

i love 2003 its way better that 2000 in every way

It's all a matter of opinion, actually.  I like both 2000 and 2003, but I would rather use 2000.

[HolyQuebec]

yup. rpg maker 2003. theres 2000+ stuff added = 2003. and yes,like i saw upscreen, no one,or barely, is using rm2k anymore. go for 2k3 then.
people cant say its simplier, damn.. its like the same thing.
unless u REALLY DON'T WANT TO BOTHER with Battlecharsets or Weaponcharsets, Rm2k3 FTW! ^^

[Star_wolf]

I guess 2003 has more stuff than 2000

[Polraudio]

I mainly like 2003 because of its side battle system.

[Best-Gammer]

yup. rpg maker 2003. theres 2000+ stuff added = 2003. and yes,like i saw upscreen, no one,or barely, is using rm2k anymore. go for 2k3 then.
people cant say its simplier, damn.. its like the same thing.
unless u REALLY DON'T WANT TO BOTHER with Battlecharsets or Weaponcharsets, Rm2k3 FTW! ^^

2k for the simpler games 2k3 for advance games