RMRK is retiring.
Registration is disabled. The site will remain online, but eventually become a read-only archive. More information.

RMRK.net has nothing to do with Blockchains, Cryptocurrency or NFTs. We have been around since the early 2000s, but there is a new group using the RMRK name that deals with those things. We have nothing to do with them.
NFTs are a scam, and if somebody is trying to persuade you to buy or invest in crypto/blockchain/NFT content, please turn them down and save your money. See this video for more information.
Rpg Maker 20003 or 2000

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

**
Rep:
Level 87
Hay there what Rpg maker would you use most 2000 or 20003 I thought Rpg maker 2003 was cooler then rpg maker 2000 watcha think

lol ;8

*
Shooting for the "MEMBER MODERATOR OF THE YEAR 2007" Award
Rep:
Level 89
Hi, there.
RPG Maker 2003, I dont think anyone uses 2000 anymore.
Sig by MacGravel

**
Rep:
Level 87
Well there are a couple of forums out that still use and only use 2000 and thats good for some I like rpg maker 2003 and 95 but I hate 2000
lol :police:

pokeball :)OfflineMale
********
Cheese
Rep:
Level 95
?
i'd use 2k3. 2000 is a little to old for me.
Watch out for: HaloOfTheSun

*
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The nice kind of alien~
Rep:
Level 92
Martian - Occasionally kind
I have only used 2000 and XP. :o

****
Rep:
Level 89
There is an RPGMaker 20003? thats pretty futuristic aint it?

*****
Art Master
Rep:
Level 90
I like both 2000 and 2003 and I can not really choose a favorite. They both have their good sides and I enjoy using them both. However, overall, 2003 is better.

*******
Communism<3
Rep:
Level 91
@nets- Spread your bullshit somewhere else... Despite what you think this forum isn't filled with five year olds and "friend of a friend" is laughable.

**
Rep:
Level 88
OVER 9000!!!!!!!!!!
There is an RPGMaker 20003? thats pretty futuristic aint it?

Wow 20003 I havn't even heard of it! but I like 2000 better, it's simpler
Signature goes here

***
Rep:
Level 88
0w/\/Z0Rz im back Baby!
i prefer 2000 becaus if you cant find battle charas and have hard times usingn 2003 command's...2000 is the way to go not to mention the chara downloads such as   


Rpg Maker 2000 RTP 1.0 (Required for 2000)
Size: 11.4 mb Author: Don Miguel
Description: The run time package that contains all the resources for RM2000.

 Rpg Maker 2000 RTP 1.32
Size: 7.22 mb Author: Don Miguel
Description: An additional run time package that contains extra resources for RM2000


really saves the problem im massive imports unlike 2003.....
September 13, 2007, 06:56:52 PM <-  Last Login
.
I returned and better than ever!
.
Don't mess with me.
.
Ever....

***
Rep:
Level 87
RMU Admin
i love 2003 its way better that 2000 in every way

******
Rep:
Level 89
Let's attack agressively.
2k3, hands down (even though i have 2k)

*****
Art Master
Rep:
Level 90
i love 2003 its way better that 2000 in every way

It's all a matter of opinion, actually.  I like both 2000 and 2003, but I would rather use 2000.

****
GG FUCKING FAGGOT
Rep:
Level 88
Lulz.
yup. rpg maker 2003. theres 2000+ stuff added = 2003. and yes,like i saw upscreen, no one,or barely, is using rm2k anymore. go for 2k3 then. :D
people cant say its simplier, damn.. its like the same thing.
unless u REALLY DON'T WANT TO BOTHER with Battlecharsets or Weaponcharsets, Rm2k3 FTW! ^^ ;)

***
Rep:
Level 87
LOSER
I guess 2003 has more stuff than 2000

***
Rep:
Level 87
RMU Admin
I mainly like 2003 because of its side battle system.

***
Rep:
Level 88
0w/\/Z0Rz im back Baby!
yup. rpg maker 2003. theres 2000+ stuff added = 2003. and yes,like i saw upscreen, no one,or barely, is using rm2k anymore. go for 2k3 then. :D
people cant say its simplier, damn.. its like the same thing.
unless u REALLY DON'T WANT TO BOTHER with Battlecharsets or Weaponcharsets, Rm2k3 FTW! ^^ ;)
2k for the simpler games 2k3 for advance games
September 13, 2007, 06:56:52 PM <-  Last Login
.
I returned and better than ever!
.
Don't mess with me.
.
Ever....