Main Menu
  • Welcome to The RPG Maker Resource Kit.

Titanic 2 Trailer (Yes, a sequel to Titanic)

Started by Roph, July 29, 2010, 01:59:45 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Roph

[fright]bringing sexy back[/fright]

Sophist

[fright]you awoke in a burning paperhouse
from the infinite fields of dreamless sleep
[/fright]

cozziekuns

Looks gay. Why would they send a ship that already sunk to sail the seas again -.-

Jonesy

Wikipedia says it's not a sequel. And it looks shit anyway, so meh :P
I'm much too lazy to put an actual signature here.

Jules

Stupid, and I'm so sick of these films.  They can't come up with interesting original concepts so "let's redo one that's already been made.. only better".  I think they bank on the first films popularity to carry the second one.  RARELY has anything been better than the way they did it the first time.

/rant

ahref


Nessiah



Zylos

Wait, is this a real movie? Like coming out in theaters or just some stupid TV thing?




Xiofire

#8
Wait, so they set sail, on the same day, on a replica of the same ship, same time, same course, everything, and they crash and sink....again?
Why didn't they just do it as a modern re-imagining, rather then trying to prissy up the story about it being an anniversary to the first Titanic?
Oh boy :')

EDIT: And if that wasn't enough, the first Titanic is being re-released in 2012 in 3D. Just....wow :')

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic_%281997_film%29

"The film is due to be re-released in theatres in 2012 after Cameron completes its 3-D conversion."

IAMFORTE

Oh geez. The stupidity of this movie knows no bounds

Reminds me of all the poisiden remakes

Jules

Quote from: Xiofire on July 29, 2010, 04:24:16 PM
Wait, so they set sail, on the same day, on a replica of the same ship, same time, same course, everything, and they crash and sink....again?
Why didn't they just do it as a modern re-imagining, rather then trying to prissy up the story about it being an anniversary to the first Titanic?
Oh boy :')

EDIT: And if that wasn't enough, the first Titanic is being re-released in 2012 in 3D. Just....wow :')

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic_%281997_film%29

"The film is due to be re-released in theatres in 2012 after Cameron completes its 3-D conversion."

............  Please No   >_<   


off-topic:  THERE'S A SNAKE IN MY BOOTS!

I'm sorry.. I simply could not resist.  ;9

Xiofire

Quote from: LadyJules on July 29, 2010, 06:36:04 PM
Quote from: Xiofire on July 29, 2010, 04:24:16 PM
Wait, so they set sail, on the same day, on a replica of the same ship, same time, same course, everything, and they crash and sink....again?
Why didn't they just do it as a modern re-imagining, rather then trying to prissy up the story about it being an anniversary to the first Titanic?
Oh boy :')

EDIT: And if that wasn't enough, the first Titanic is being re-released in 2012 in 3D. Just....wow :')

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic_%281997_film%29

"The film is due to be re-released in theatres in 2012 after Cameron completes its 3-D conversion."

............  Please No   >_<   


off-topic:  THERE'S A SNAKE IN MY BOOTS!

I'm sorry.. I simply could not resist.  ;9

Reach for the sky? :')

But yeah, Hollywood has no more ideas. I think they keep all of them at Pixar :3

IAMFORTE

Its kinda necroposting yes, but if anyone is interested in watching how bad this is, I could upload a mp4 version.


And by how bad this is, it looks like 60% of this movie is cgi
ugggh

Sashikinaroji

that sounds fantastic... And by fantastic, of course, I mean that it sounds so deliciously horrible, that the Wayans brothers, Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer could feed on it.
Ok, DON'T EXPECT HELP FROM ME~! I will perhaps rant a bit, but don't expect me to do graphics for you, even if I say I will... I won't.

Jonesy

Quote from: Xiofire on July 29, 2010, 04:24:16 PM
Wait, so they set sail, on the same day, on a replica of the same ship, same time, same course, everything, and they crash and sink....again?
Why didn't they just do it as a modern re-imagining, rather then trying to prissy up the story about it being an anniversary to the first Titanic?
Oh boy :')

EDIT: And if that wasn't enough, the first Titanic is being re-released in 2012 in 3D. Just....wow :')

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic_%281997_film%29

"The film is due to be re-released in theatres in 2012 after Cameron completes its 3-D conversion."

How do you convert a 2d film into 3d?
I'm much too lazy to put an actual signature here.

Holkeye

When reality begins to look more ridiculous than satire, satire is dead.

Irock

Quote from: Jonesy on September 01, 2010, 05:41:08 AM
Quote from: Xiofire on July 29, 2010, 04:24:16 PM
Wait, so they set sail, on the same day, on a replica of the same ship, same time, same course, everything, and they crash and sink....again?
Why didn't they just do it as a modern re-imagining, rather then trying to prissy up the story about it being an anniversary to the first Titanic?
Oh boy :')

EDIT: And if that wasn't enough, the first Titanic is being re-released in 2012 in 3D. Just....wow :')

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic_%281997_film%29

"The film is due to be re-released in theatres in 2012 after Cameron completes its 3-D conversion."

How do you convert a 2d film into 3d?
Go back in time and make sure it's recorded in 3D. Duh.

IAMFORTE

Quote from: Irock on September 02, 2010, 09:33:40 AM
Quote from: Jonesy on September 01, 2010, 05:41:08 AM
Quote from: Xiofire on July 29, 2010, 04:24:16 PM
Wait, so they set sail, on the same day, on a replica of the same ship, same time, same course, everything, and they crash and sink....again?
Why didn't they just do it as a modern re-imagining, rather then trying to prissy up the story about it being an anniversary to the first Titanic?
Oh boy :')

EDIT: And if that wasn't enough, the first Titanic is being re-released in 2012 in 3D. Just....wow :')

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic_%281997_film%29

"The film is due to be re-released in theatres in 2012 after Cameron completes its 3-D conversion."

How do you convert a 2d film into 3d?
Go back in time and make sure it's recorded in 3D. Duh.

Makes perfect sense

Tezuka

I love the 3D movie trailers where everything is like "WOAH I AM THROWING THIS AT YOU THROUGH THE SCREEN". It's amazingly cheesy.

Sashikinaroji

Quote from: IAMFORTE on September 02, 2010, 01:12:18 PM
Quote from: Irock on September 02, 2010, 09:33:40 AM
Quote from: Jonesy on September 01, 2010, 05:41:08 AM
Quote from: Xiofire on July 29, 2010, 04:24:16 PM
Wait, so they set sail, on the same day, on a replica of the same ship, same time, same course, everything, and they crash and sink....again?
Why didn't they just do it as a modern re-imagining, rather then trying to prissy up the story about it being an anniversary to the first Titanic?
Oh boy :')

EDIT: And if that wasn't enough, the first Titanic is being re-released in 2012 in 3D. Just....wow :')

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic_%281997_film%29

"The film is due to be re-released in theatres in 2012 after Cameron completes its 3-D conversion."

How do you convert a 2d film into 3d?
Go back in time and make sure it's recorded in 3D. Duh.

Makes perfect sense

If I recall correctly... Alice in Wonderland was shot in 2D and converted... but I may be wrong... (did I necro??? Nah... Just a week.)
Ok, DON'T EXPECT HELP FROM ME~! I will perhaps rant a bit, but don't expect me to do graphics for you, even if I say I will... I won't.

Sophist

Converting uses a stereoscopic (?) technique to overlay the original film with the half shades of pulp red and blue to double vision.
[fright]you awoke in a burning paperhouse
from the infinite fields of dreamless sleep
[/fright]

Holkeye


Sophist

Yeah, not huge into the 3D scene and all that, learn somethin new every day.
[fright]you awoke in a burning paperhouse
from the infinite fields of dreamless sleep
[/fright]

Grafikal


Holkeye

Quote from: Dorothy on September 10, 2010, 02:08:13 AM
Yeah, not huge into the 3D scene and all that, learn somethin new every day.

Me either, but I read this article in PopSci a little while before Avatar came out that was talking about polarization and stuff. It was pretty interesting.