Main Menu
  • Welcome to The RPG Maker Resource Kit.

DX10

Started by Link, July 10, 2008, 04:59:31 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Link

I want it gone ;o;

Or at least to stop my PC from using it

:)

Watch out for: HaloOfTheSun

Link

So that's a no =(

Roph

Upgrade to XP?

Though, why would you want to use DX9 instead of 10 if you're already on vista?
[fright]bringing sexy back[/fright]

Link

Quote from: Roph on July 10, 2008, 06:28:03 PM
Upgrade to XP?

Though, why would you want to use DX9 instead of 10 if you're already on vista?

My card cant do DX10, but it still uses it, =/

And vista works fine :P

Tezuka

I assume you are saying you want DX9 because you got an error saying that you need certain DX9 DLLs?

You can always download the certain DLL files that you need, then place them in your system folder (that is what I do anyway).

http://www.dll-files.com/

Link

Nah just, my card is performs better when using DX9.0c

Roph

You know DirectX is cumulative, right? So you could run a DirectX 6 game on your DirectX 7 card through DirectX 10?

DirectX10 contains all the technology, APIs etc that DirectX 9 has. If your card is only DX9, then it will only use the DX9 calls obviously.

The lower performance is because you're on Vista, not because you're using DX10. Basically, you think you know what you want but you're wrong.

My recommendation is again to upgrade to Windows XP.
[fright]bringing sexy back[/fright]

Link

Ok i think i explained it wrong >.<

When i used my card in DX9 it was able of higher graphic settings than when it uses DX10.

._.

And again Vista isnt that bad  ;8

As when i used XP i had no sound >_>

ahref

vista requires more graphical rendering from your card because it wants to be cool. xp keeps things flat and to a minimal theres no transparency or stupid visual effects.

more video ram used up by your os = less to the games = it cant render the game as detailed as vista has its size 20 foot in the door.

upgrade to windows xp

Link

Yeah i know. but i thought 2 gig of visual RAM could do that

._.

ahref

videoram or ram?

im finding it hard to find a graphics card with 2gbs of video ram but there may be one that exists im just checking

Sophist

I have 512 vram ._.;;
[fright]you awoke in a burning paperhouse
from the infinite fields of dreamless sleep
[/fright]

Malson

vista isn't really that bad, it's just that it's too far ahead for the time being. In a few years it's going to be amazing. I still remember the same skepticism people had for XP when it first came out, but now everyone's praising it. Just give it time.

Link

Quote from: Dr Lionhat on July 12, 2008, 12:04:20 AM
videoram or ram?

im finding it hard to find a graphics card with 2gbs of video ram but there may be one that exists im just checking

Well it is 1gig, but it steals some of my 4gb RAM and makes it 2gig ._.