RMRK Level System

Jalkson · May 24, 2007, 10:12:08 PM

Quote from: Roph on May 24, 2007, 04:03:06 PM
You have to have 70 (or 80? something like that) posts before you can edit rep.

I think it's 75.

I really like this level idea, I don't care much for the post count, and as said before it does fit better since it's an RPG board.

Deliciously_Saucy · May 25, 2007, 01:37:56 AM

Oh god I hate deja vu... Creeps me out.

Good work and all that~

SirJackRex · May 25, 2007, 02:07:41 AM

Yes!
I like the new changes. Awesome.

yeah, Deja Vu is kind of creepy.

Irock · May 25, 2007, 03:15:03 AM

The new changes made my level go up.

I like them.

SirJackRex · May 25, 2007, 03:22:56 AM

Yep, I'm now level 37, instead of level 32!

modern algebra · May 25, 2007, 04:40:41 AM

Is this a glitch, or is this person supposed to be such a high level:

SirJackRex · May 25, 2007, 04:43:06 AM

Same thing I know.

I've seen members with like 100 posts at level 33.

Irock · May 25, 2007, 06:22:28 AM

Defiantly an error.
Her rep is 0, she has 1 post, and she registeredb April 29, 2007.

Silverline, you got some splainin' to do.

SirJackRex · May 25, 2007, 06:30:34 AM

Quote from: Irock on May 25, 2007, 06:22:28 AM
Silverline, you got some splainin' to do.

Wow, haven't heard that in forever!

Yeah, like almost every new member is level 31...

Roph · May 25, 2007, 09:20:29 AM

Link? Or did you post these posts like ages ago. There was a period of like half an hour or so while I took the old one out (fucked with everyone's level) then put the new one in.

I just went to the member's list, found a new member with a couple of posts, found a post by them, and their level is 0 (60%). Looks fine to me.

Winged · May 25, 2007, 10:23:31 AM

I like post counts more...I can't see my smexy and first 1k posts when I post and I'm not bothered to go into my profile

It's not that bad though...it's a pretty good idea for an RPG Maker forum...

~Winged

Roph · May 25, 2007, 10:27:27 AM

Quote from: modern algebra on May 25, 2007, 04:40:41 AM
Is this a glitch, or is this person supposed to be such a high level:

That is as expected. She's a couple hundred down as for user ID.

Irock · May 25, 2007, 04:24:19 PM

Her user ID is high, but her register date was April 29, 2007? That doesn't make any sense.

modern algebra · May 25, 2007, 04:32:43 PM

The later registered, the higher the user ID. Your level appears to be based on how much less your ID is then the latest registered (maybe?). Thus, her level is high because she her ID is 200 less than the latest registrant? maybe?

Well whatever, I'm happy with it.

Irock · May 25, 2007, 04:34:47 PM

No, the older the member, the lower the ID. Crankeye has user ID 1, and she has a really high ID since she's new.

Roph · May 25, 2007, 04:41:12 PM

Quote from: modern algebra on May 25, 2007, 04:32:43 PM
The later registered, the higher the user ID. Your level appears to be based on how much less your ID is then the latest registered (maybe?). Thus, her level is high because she her ID is 200 less than the latest registrant? maybe?

Well whatever, I'm happy with it.

Spot on. If a user (like her) with an ID 200 below and if the current newest registered member posted 200 times, they'd have the same level. There's nothing wrong with it, it's working exactly as it's supposed to.

It's much easier to gain your first levels. For example her, with just 200 getting level 10, though me with an ID thousands below and also having thousands of posts being level 61.

:) · May 25, 2007, 11:29:40 PM

so, anyway to check a level list?

Moss. · May 26, 2007, 01:29:18 AM

sw33t gr4ph d00d

Arrow · May 26, 2007, 02:47:30 AM

Quote from: Roph on May 25, 2007, 04:41:12 PM

Roph obviously has a ball mouse.

Or some damn shaky hands.

Moss. · May 26, 2007, 02:53:45 AM

Or ... a mouse. Because for most normal people, drawing straight or smoothly curved lines with any kind of mouse is damn near impossible.

Holkeye · May 26, 2007, 04:00:20 AM

Quote from: Captain Jean-Luc PiKarl of the U.S.S. Enterprise on May 26, 2007, 02:53:45 AM
Or ... a mouse. Because for most normal people, drawing straight or smoothly curved lines with any kind of mouse is damn near impossible.

Yeah, especially when they're all squirming around. I find it works a lot better if you break their necks first.

What? Oh... that kind of mouse.

SirJackRex · May 26, 2007, 04:09:00 AM

Quote from: Holkeye on May 26, 2007, 04:00:20 AM
Quote from: Captain Jean-Luc PiKarl of the U.S.S. Enterprise on May 26, 2007, 02:53:45 AM
Or ... a mouse. Because for most normal people, drawing straight or smoothly curved lines with any kind of mouse is damn near impossible.

Yeah, especially when they're all squirming around. I find it works a lot better if you break their necks first.

What? Oh... that kind of mouse.

best thing on this forum yet.

kid27 · May 26, 2007, 07:08:14 AM

Quote from: Mexnetobest thing on this forum yet.

Excluding... ermm... I dunno... EXCLUDING SOMETHING!!!

Roph · May 26, 2007, 09:55:42 AM

It's a barebones ultra cheap low dpi optical mouse.

Seriously, your average decent-ish optical mouse is like, 200dpi, this is like 30

SirJackRex · May 27, 2007, 05:36:05 AM

Mine is a logitech wireless op mouse mini.

But, I love the new system, I'm almost level 40!!! WOOT WOOT!