Should guns be banned?

[cobragamer]

That is the stupidest thing that I have heard yes a sword can kill some one but not like a bullet can from 20m away

[oneray]

America= yes to guns = big crime rate
Rest of the World (expect some)= no to guns= low crime rate

I can't dumb it down any further.

I don't want to write this again...

[Ruhani777]

people dont have the time for training, that why more people prefer guns than swords. faster and effecient. Also swords create heavy blood loss, and vital organs are more likely to be damaged, rather than such a small bullet, which depends on where it is shot on the victim, and the bullet's size. Seriously, you're really the only one to speak for swords.

onray thats not how it works. take away guns, you give more oppurtinities of killing innocents (law abiders) to the ones that use guns for awful purposes.

its piss annoying when people ignore import points, and post whatever they wish.

[oneray]

No it doesn't.  Like i said before, a gun is an act, not a reaction.  Plus, barely anyone, besides the US, have guns. You can't deny it. Those countries with less "law abiders" owning guns have a lower crime rate. Your "oppuritinties" theory doesn't work then.

[Ruhani777]

you think those less law abiders are afraid of killing someone? thats why people need guns to protect themselves. And a gun isnt an ACT its a tool used for killing, as well as swords and sticks. Its people that kill, and thats why i reccommend heavy restrictions upon them.

[Elegy]

people dont have the time for training, that why more people prefer guns than swords. faster and effecient. Also swords create heavy blood loss, and vital organs are more likely to be damaged, rather than such a small bullet, which depends on where it is shot on the victim, and the bullet's size. Seriously, you're really the only one to speak for swords.

onray thats not how it works. take away guns, you give more oppurtinities of killing innocents (law abiders) to the ones that use guns for awful purposes.

its piss annoying when people ignore import points, and post whatever they wish.

Why are you going into the mechanics of swords and guns, who gives a fuck about the user of the weapon, let them kill eachother, it's all the innocent people who are the important ones.

If you're stupid enough to pick up a weapon, then I sincerely hope you get killed by one.

[Ruhani777]

is that supposed to be a freakin threat, you have a higher chance of being killed than I, because i am to defend myself. If you're thinking about letting them kill each other, why argue against guns. Get that shit through your thick head.

[Elegy]

You really are ignorant, READ the posts.

Guns = Bystander might get shot.
Swords/nunchucks/normal nuns/kittens/hands/nothing/banana = Bystander doesn't get shot!!


Do you understand or do I have to draw you a picture?

[Djangonator]

If you make a wide swing/let go you might accidentally cut them.

[Deliciously_Saucy]

Try to have some dignity in your posts, both of you. (Not @ Djang)

[Ruhani777]

it depends on whom you're gonna use the gun on. It doesnt matter the weapon, its just that all weapons kill, and i feel gun's shouldnt be banned. A guy with a sword is more of a hostile threat than a guy with a concealed weapon. You think ppl are actually gonna go fight with stix and rox? Hey look, im robbing this dude with a stick, where as he has a gun to defend himself with!

[Elegy]

Your form of dignity appears to be complacency and ass-kissing, I'm better off without it.

I'm the only one who creates any real entropy around here, if you want someone to agree with you go talk to a wall.
Arguments are about disagreement and that is what I provide.

[Djangonator]

This isn't about disorder or arguments, twat. It's debating. It ought to be polite.

[Ruhani777]

Your form of dignity appears to be complacency and ass-kissing, I'm better off without it.

I'm the only one who creates any real entropy around here, if you want someone to agree with you go talk to a wall.
Arguments are about disagreement and that is what I provide.

pffft, arguements are about debate, and you're the one kisses ass. i bet if you talk to real americans, i damn well guaruntee they'll choose guns over swords. because why waste time on them, and i bet 99% of the people dont know how to use a sword any way.

[Deliciously_Saucy]

You can be rude to each other, just do it without sounding so childish.

[gonorrhea]

This thread has taken a turn for the STUPID.

Lock?

[haloOfTheSun]

I'm the only one who creates any real entropy around here, if you want someone to agree with you go talk to a wall.
Arguments are about disagreement and that is what I provide.

No, you just disagree for the sake of disagreeing. You do nothing but add ridiculous arguments that rarely make any logical sense. If you're going to play devil's advocate, you should at least be intelligent enough to do so, which is one thing you're not.