Nude photographs of Disney star Venessa Hudgens, of High School Musical, have hit the internet
NSFW:
http://www.popcrunch.com/vanessa-hudgens-nude/
Disney most likely fired her.
But I'd like to also bring this up; her myspace:
http://www.myspace.com/vanessahudgens
Look at all the rabid fanboy/girlism in the comments section! All these people saying it's "not a big deal" or it's "okay" or "I still respect you."
How can people possibly respect someone after a scandal like this? SHE WORKED FOR DISNEY!
But then I remember that this is myspace, and myspace is also full of people that pictures of themselves naked. And I die a little inside.
Any thoughts/comments?
This seems like another generic nude case. Victoria Beckham had them too, it'll calm down sooner or later. Besides, she can do whatever she wants and she's just too stunning to be working for Disney imo ~
But it's a little sad for someone to go from Disney Superstar that 13 year old boys and girls watch, to amateur pornstar overnight.
I don't think it will hurt her in the long run, but it will defiantly make Disney fire her, and she'll probably have trouble getting hired for a couple of months.
Wow, so far this thread has gotten the exact opposite reception it got on the other forum I visit.
Link to the other forum :3
This is actually hilarious, but I think it would make her more popular, don't you think?
Rule 34 D'oh!
Quote from: arlen on September 08, 2007, 04:13:57 PM
But it's a little sad for someone to go from Disney Superstar that 13 year old boys and girls watch, to amateur pornstar overnight.
A single picture of her naked hardly qualifies her as an "amateur pornstar."
It was an exaggeration; not meant to be taken seriously, Zypher.
edit: Lol, I totally butchered her last name.
Quote from: arlen on September 08, 2007, 04:16:48 PM
Wow, so far this thread has gotten the exact opposite reception it got on the other forum I visit.
What did
they say?
Most of them called her a whore, irresponsible especially for her position as a Disney star, and basically laughed and ridiculed her.
I got the "Amateur Pornstar" line from that forum and used it here because I thought it would bring lulz.
Quote from: arlen on September 08, 2007, 07:00:33 PM
It was an exaggeration; not meant to be taken seriously, Zypher.
Heh. I guess my point is, people are saying it's not a big deal because
it really isn't that big a deal. At least, it shouldn't be to anyone but her. Unless this is just another Jenna Lewis scenario (in which case I would have no sympathy for her), in the end it's just a naked photo. Okay, so we've seen her naked. So what? It shouldn't affect her acting career in the least bit becaue it's not like the picture was shown to the public with her consent. Having seen her with no clothes on shouldn't really affect anyone's opinion of her, especially when you consider people saw it against her desires. It's a shame for her that this happened, but as is usually the case, things are made a bigger deal than they really should be.
And I'm saying it's absolutely pathetic that things like this happen. If you take pictures of yourself naked, or have someone else do it, okay, you're kinda kinky, but whatever. If they end up on the internet, you're a fucking retard, and a bit of a whore, now. And I think it is kind of a big deal, because these people are supposed to be role models for children. And I don't see how the public consent thing makes a difference. Fact is, a barely 18 year old from the Disney network now has photos of herself naked all over the internet. And yes, it does effect people's opinions of her. I don't understand how you think it couldn't. But I guess it all comes down to a person's upbringing and all, but according to my upbringing, taking pictures of yourself naked = not alright.
People request the photos like, every fifteen minutes at 4chan.
HAHHAHAHA Link them here. Also, I got tricked into clicking on it by my friend. ;__;
Uh, the photos have been linked to in this thread since the second it was made.
Quote from: arlen on September 08, 2007, 07:21:35 PM
And I'm saying it's absolutely pathetic that things like this happen. If you take pictures of yourself naked, or have someone else do it, okay, you're kinda kinky, but whatever. If they end up on the internet, you're a fucking retard, and a bit of a whore, now.
I agree that this is pretty pathetic and that she should have done a better job making sure that these pictures stayed private. However, I wouldn't go so far as to call her a whore. She has a boyfriend and as far as I figure she doesn't have sex promiscuously.
QuoteAnd I think it is kind of a big deal, because these people are supposed to be role models for children.
Only the stupidest of stupid children would go and say "hey Vanessa took nudes of herself, that's so cool! I'm going to do it right now"
QuoteAnd I don't see how the public consent thing makes a difference. Fact is, a barely 18 year old from the Disney network now has photos of herself naked all over the internet. And yes, it does effect people's opinions of her. I don't understand how you think it couldn't.
...because it's not her fault the pictures are all over the internet? She took naked pictures for private purposes and someone got a hold of them. She never intended for that to happen, and the only way it would really affect my opinion of her is to think she's irresponsible. But she's a teenager, so that's pretty much a given.
QuoteBut I guess it all comes down to a person's upbringing and all, but according to my upbringing, taking pictures of yourself naked = not alright.
Taking pictures of yourself naked with the intention of showing the public is indeed not alright. However, this isn't the case here.
Quote from: Arrow-1 on September 08, 2007, 08:10:05 PM
People request the photos like, every fifteen minutes at 4chan.
Quote from: arlen on September 08, 2007, 08:24:49 PM
Uh, the photos have been linked to in this thread since the second it was made.
I was referring to Arrow and telling him to link 4chan to here, lol.
you dont link 4chan it dies to fast
Quote from: Zypher on September 08, 2007, 08:35:23 PM
Quote from: arlen on September 08, 2007, 07:21:35 PM
And I'm saying it's absolutely pathetic that things like this happen. If you take pictures of yourself naked, or have someone else do it, okay, you're kinda kinky, but whatever. If they end up on the internet, you're a fucking retard, and a bit of a whore, now.
I agree that this is pretty pathetic and that she should have done a better job making sure that these pictures stayed private. However, I wouldn't go so far as to call her a whore. She has a boyfriend and as far as I figure she doesn't have sex promiscuously.
I wasn't implying anything about being promiscuous, I was implying that having nudes of yourself on the internet makes people THINK you're a whore.
QuoteQuoteAnd I think it is kind of a big deal, because these people are supposed to be role models for children.
Only the stupidest of stupid children would go and say "hey Vanessa took nudes of herself, that's so cool! I'm going to do it right now"
Myspace. Enough said, there. Children ARE stupid.
QuoteQuoteAnd I don't see how the public consent thing makes a difference. Fact is, a barely 18 year old from the Disney network now has photos of herself naked all over the internet. And yes, it does effect people's opinions of her. I don't understand how you think it couldn't.
...because it's not her fault the pictures are all over the internet? She took naked pictures for private purposes and someone got a hold of them. She never intended for that to happen, and the only way it would really affect my opinion of her is to think she's irresponsible. But she's a teenager, so that's pretty much a given.
Not much to argue about, here.
QuoteQuoteBut I guess it all comes down to a person's upbringing and all, but according to my upbringing, taking pictures of yourself naked = not alright.
Taking pictures of yourself naked with the intention of showing the public is indeed not alright. However, this isn't the case here.
I didn't say she took them with the intention of showing the public. I said taking nudes of yourself in general is not alright. This is where the "individual person's upbringing" thing I mentioned comes into play.
Quote from: Dr Sword on September 08, 2007, 10:20:48 PM
you dont link 4chan it dies to fast
Other way around, sword.
~
While were at it, we should throw NSFW in the title.
Quote from: EVAProject01 on September 09, 2007, 02:37:11 AM
While were at it, we should throw NSFW in the title.
;o
isn't it like...common sense? xD
Yeah, but with the picture totally visible on the page then it's NSFW. Doesn't matter if it is in a link, no? :blizj:
She's a normal human being, but in the eyes of her fans, she's a young rolemodel and this sort of thing is not a good example.
You'd think celebrities would know by now that any nude/risque/embarassing pix = getting on the internet. I don't think she's a bad person, just sort of dumb and irresponsible. But who isn't at some point or another?
And the comment regarding stupid kids? Read some of the comments on her myspace. Classics include:
"OMG.....¡¡¡¡ NESSA thank you soooo much for add me , your my idol, my model to follow,I want be like you some day....your funny, cute and pretty...I soport you forever....FAN FOREVER I AN FROM VENEZUELA ...<3 <3"
"ok eaven those imbaressing pic.s have gotten out i still hope there is gona be a high school 3 maybe lol"
"r u really coming to my birthday party in Chilton WI at my house thats what Ashley said"
"omg where are people finding these pictures of her anyywayys?"
A retarded amount of people with bad comments are from wisconsin :shame:. And an even more retarded amount of people are over 17. I was under the impression HSM was targetted at the 10-13 age group :(