A bigot is a prejudiced person who is intolerant of opinions, lifestyles or identities differing from their own. The origin of the word in English dates back to at least 1598, via Middle French, and started with the sense of religious hypocrite, especially a woman.
Bigot is often used as a pejorative term against a person who is obstinately devoted to their prejudices even when these views are challenged or proven to be false. Forms of bigotry may have a related ideology or world views.
--Wikkipedia
& i really don't care about spelling, tis my way
You're a moderator? wow
dunno where you pulled that definition from, but nice one trying to call me out with semantics in an argument where I'm saying the terminology is redundant... lol, all i'm saying is it wouldn't hurt yall to get cultured. read some crowley, pick up some other religions; this mechanized denial is only a shadow of predestined thought.
I don't want attention. I honestly thought that most would agree with me.
I do believe this life is a game, a contest of the gods to find the best players to save the universe.
This was not a joke. this is the way i relate to this topic.
& to insult me as though I cannot see where I am posting... lol,
moderate indeed. I clearly see the topic & truly do believe my comparisons to games are valid.
as mentioned, the first final fantasy tactics deals directly with the middle ages & the editing of the Bible. To play the game through, one will find gnosticism, the secret evocations of the high priests in the churches, etc. art = life, life = art, and games are the multimedia systhesis of many at once. this is all vvalid to the point when trying to differentiate between free will & predestination, as the ideologies are cause and effect from those ancient languages.
To call final fantasy's japanese perspective on religion invalid is to lose a great amount of wisdom through racism, ethnocentrism & bigotry.
They hold as honest perspectives in any argument if merely given a chance.
I would like to say that this lack of imagination & understanding is troublesome... thus far i could not collaborate with any of you responding as per closed minded perspectives.
IMHO, majick clearly effected the different perspectives juxtaposed with the Bible, & most especially the new testament, by means of this same sort of social labeling.
sociology? I know it. I see the negative bard debuff that is scribed on this forum, accusations to insult me. i see them as spells & they only give me more power. I know social labeling when i see it, this is it clear & simple, flaming on & on, the endless debate over the obvious. Yet, my songs course through the spirit of the forum now jsut as much, who can say who is right?
if this was a few hundred years ago, instead of calling me stupid & immature, i would be a heretic witch, burnt for sorcery. if this was a few thousand, a druid or bard hunted by the empire, a tribal shaman moved from home with imperial rule. these are all huge AoE bard songs or ethnocentricity, & i see through it like the layers of this reality.
also, simply, the myth of jesus practiced majick. remember? water to wine? healing? reincarnation? call it a miracle, & you will find little different between the definitions.
majick is the way of will
idolatry is the way of predestination
for the record, star wars is loosly based on what might be yet takes much of its philosophy from religion. The idea is not completely without merit, but the first three movies were a little crappy to base a religion on. I would, however argue much of fantasy is applicably real, especially JRR Tolkien or Jordan or final fantasy. we have been making instruments, as a people, for over 300,000 years, & the new fossil of hume beginings is dated at 3.3million: a lot more happened then most can imagine. so, no star wars religion or anything, but I do believe every story I have ever heard is real to some place & time.