The Real Final Fantasy 7?

wildrj · April 06, 2006, 02:32:37 AM

have no idea lol wait yeah i do it shows that making ff7 made future ff games worth playing

SexualBubblegumX · April 06, 2006, 07:58:50 PM

Square should never of had anything to do with sony. Sony cares more about a game looking good than playing good.

Sony has had some good games. I will admit. But most psx/ps2 games aren't very fun.

sepiroth666 · April 06, 2006, 11:39:53 PM

Sony has no influence over the games produced.
Square is 3rd party.

Tyhan · April 07, 2006, 01:47:17 PM

Quote from: FuMannChu on April 05, 2006, 02:07:51 AM
I mainly hate FF7, becuase Sephiroth had no personality.

Don't talk, you're only 30 miles off.

Personally I think 6 was okay, but I really liked the original 1 and 3.

A sequel on the N64? No. Nononono @_@

You have to play FF7, but Sephiroth wasn't a jackass who killed anyone until he found out what they had done to Jenova (his mother). He was partnered up with Cloud, both 1st rank soldiers, and they travelling around on a mission given to them by Soldier, big mistake by them.

Blizzard · April 07, 2006, 02:50:41 PM

I

Tyhan · April 07, 2006, 03:20:20 PM

I heard the SNES could have been made with a 3D graphics driver but it wasn't all that good so they chose not to.

Blizzard · April 07, 2006, 04:21:45 PM

Yeah, actually there were some games using a 3D chip. e.g. Star Fox or Mario Kart. I forgot the name but it was called Super FX chip I think. It was with the catridge together.

lilgoaliebro · April 13, 2006, 07:47:05 PM

Yeah FF7 was really cool so I'd keep it. But who knows what FF6-2 would be like. but cloud and Sephiroth are like the coolest (and they are so awesome in KH1 & 2!) But a remake of FF7 on PS3 would most likely be the most amazing game ever. And even if it was just okay, it would sell so much becuase of all the hardcore FF7 fans.

Jet · April 13, 2006, 11:19:47 PM

There are still a lot of rumors about there even being a remake of VII. Don't get me wrong, I'd love it, but I'm not so sure it's going to happen. Anyway, I think Square made a very good choice. Nintendo is known for being rather "cartoon"-ish. Square did not go that route, and it's worked out nicely.

Blizzard · April 13, 2006, 11:37:31 PM

Quote from: Jet on April 13, 2006, 11:19:47 PMThere are still a lot of rumors about there even being a remake of VII.

THERE WILL BE NO REMAKE OF FFVII, THIS WAS CONFIRMED BY THE MAKERS OF FFVII!

So better stop hoping. You will only get disappointed.

Yossy · April 13, 2006, 11:56:09 PM

I always sort of got the impression that the character design of Sephiroth was largely based on Setzer's appearance (FF6).

haloOfTheSun · April 13, 2006, 11:58:25 PM

Ah, screenshots, good idea. I should've done that to begin with.

Erm.. there's no screenshots actually. I guess you're getting them right now.

There was a demo video I watched, with Terra, Locke, and Shadow doing battle with some monster. It was pretty cool I guess, but kind of repetitive.

Yossy · April 14, 2006, 12:07:29 AM

Yes, I just editted it. :-D That page also has some videos, probably the one you just mentioned. Oh-em-gee Shadow & Locke = HOT SOUP!! :-D :-D

haloOfTheSun · April 14, 2006, 12:24:00 AM

That's not where I saw it, but they did steal the title of my topic, hehe.

Blizzard · April 14, 2006, 12:24:20 AM

If they had made FFVI-2 instead of FFVII, that would

dragonmagna · April 14, 2006, 12:27:27 AM

Going back on topic, I've have heard some good stuff about FF7, although I haven't played it, so I say keep that. But I do happen to NOT HEAR anything in the world involving 8,9 ,10, 10-2, 11, 12, 13, or however many stupid ff games they've made now.
If square was just square and worked with nintendo, then, well, you would have super mario rpg, which is when two companies knew what they were doing. (square didn't become stupid until they left nintendo, although they got even more stupid after ff7) *o*

haloOfTheSun · April 14, 2006, 12:28:37 AM

I think FF VI-2 would've been great, except maybe for the small problem that magic was supposed to no longer exist at the end of FF VI. But, little loopholes like this never stopped SquareEnix before.

Blizzard · April 14, 2006, 12:47:24 AM

Quote from: dragonmagna on April 14, 2006, 12:27:27 AMIf square was just square and worked with nintendo, then, well, you would have super mario rpg, which is when two companies knew what they were doing. (square didn't become stupid until they left nintendo, although they got even more stupid after ff7) *o*

I totally agree with that. I think I

Yossy · April 14, 2006, 12:58:59 AM

I think I said this before, but people seem to agree that as Square-Enix's quantity of games increase, the quality decreases. I, for one, wish they would step away from RPG's for a while, and make some sequels for Enix's sequel-deserving-non-RPG-games. But Square seems to be too busy... like... NOT doing anything of Enix's (with the sole exception of Dragon Warrior 8, which hardly even counts because it had been in production before Square and Enix merged). I think Mischief Makers, an awesome Enix game created with obvious Mega Man references, deserves a sequel.

Um. Wait. That's pretty off-topic. Sorry.

ENIX ROCKS! WOO!! *runs away*

Blizzard · April 14, 2006, 01:12:09 AM

They didn

Malson · April 14, 2006, 01:56:54 AM

I would like FF7 a lot more if they didn't kill Aeris in the middle of it. :-(

An FF6 sequel would be nice, but games like FFX-2 and Tony Hawk (uh, what is it now, 27?) have shown that sequels only ruin game series, not enhance them. It doesn't need a 3D overhaul. I don't like where RPGs have gone since 3D graphics came about. People focus way too much on the visuals instead of the characters or storyline. That's why I fear what will happen when RPG Maker 3D comes about. People will spend so much time making their newfound 3D graphics look good that the game itself will lack in quality.

As for the question itself, I'd say FF7 as it is, because although I didn't like the game as much as FF6, I wouldn't have wanted a sequel of FF6 potentially ruining the game.

GilgameshRO · April 14, 2006, 11:35:36 PM

Am I the only person who actually enjoyed FFX-2? Or just the only one who will admit it?

Malson · April 14, 2006, 11:50:12 PM

I really don't like that they reverted back to ATB for X-2. FFX had the best battle system of any RPG, in my opinion, and ever since they trashed it for X-2 I've lost interest in future Final Fantasies.

GilgameshRO · April 14, 2006, 11:53:46 PM

The ATB is what I loved about FFX-2. Best and fastest ATB I've ever seen. Unfortunetly, the game was pretty easy. It would have been nice if it had the same kinda fast paced ATB battles... but was actually hard.

Roph · April 15, 2006, 01:07:13 AM

QuoteThat's why I fear what will happen when RPG Maker 3D comes about. People will spend so much time making their newfound 3D graphics look good that the game itself will lack in quality.

lol, I think the graphics will suck, along with the games. Maybe if the entire forum teamed up and all worked hard for at least like 6 months, we could make something maybe pretty good. But that's never going to happen.