At any rate, there is only one thing I think is done outright poorly and that is the score book. I'm being a bit nerdy about this and probably no one cares, but he gave us a scorebook so it's bound to happen. I know he's publishing this symphony himself but I still thought he'd have an orchestrator or just
somebody to help with at least the layout of the score. There are several instances of directions, tempo, etc. out of alignment, smushed together, or just plain in the wrong place:
I know when it comes to engraving rules, there are many ways to do things, but I'm pretty sure that's not a viable option. Also his enharmonic spelling is often bad:
Maybe he doesn't know D flats exist or something. I kinda understand why he thought to do that, because the piano plays C#(or nat.) and D# simultaneously and you can't write D flat in that chord too. But for whomever is playing flute it makes little sense to do that and they probably wanted to smack him.
Also the choice to write in no key is sometimes questionable because there are long parts where it seems a key would have been better/more accurate, but given how much and how quickly he goes through keys it might not have mattered. Kinda torn on that.
Marimba should not go below unpitched percussion in the score order
I myself don't follow traditional orchestral score order (usually I go by concert band because it makes more sense) but in no way should that ever happen. Also he could have condensed the unpitched percussion into just a general Percussion staff and saved a lot of space.
Too many rehearsal marks. You shouldn't get to Z in a piece that straightforward
The way he wrote the harp music is acceptable, but I know that harpists prefer it to be done differently, such as putting a pedal diagram or doing this:
Simply writing "F Major" above a gliss isn't really a very good method. F major scale? F major chord? You could set the B and E pedals to the top and end up with a gliss that sounds much like an F Major chord. Or at least F7.