rep?

[tSwitch]

I said that. lol

Derp, I skimmed.

[ramon24bullet]

well then lets get the word out and get more people to join

[mouse]

It's a lot cooler a system than the simple post count titles other forums have (like proboards, for example).

[Acolyte]

We'll probably be in 2013 before somebody makes level 100.

You're almost there, Roph! Power level! Power level!

[Grafikal]

If I'm not mistaken, admins could just alter their level via their profile lol. I know I can alter post count.

[tSwitch]

If I'm not mistaken, admins could just alter their level via their profile lol. I know I can alter post count.

We could if we altered our post count like Roph did.
He's got a few thousand nonexistant posts :p

[mouse]

Just curious, but imagine a person had been here since March 2006, and had made 24,000 posts, what would their level be?

[Zylos]

Don't you dare tempt SBGX to come back with a line like that.

[mouse]

Say it and you won't be able to walk in the morning.

[Sophist]

We'll get there faster if I mess up the algorithm!

[Arrow]

Personally the algorithm seems kinda broke to me. I think post count should hold a lot more weight than signup date.

[Roph]

Well when it was made, the signup rate was much slower ;o

[Arrow]

FIX IT THEN, DAMN

[Roph]

That would change + lower everyone's levels, and make it even slower to progress though =o

I guess another way I could do it is by increasing the power of postcount, but then everyone's levels would jump ._.

[Gracie]

The less rep you have, the more obvious it is you did something really stupid at some point.

[Sophist]

Counter balance the two by equal measures

profit

[Roph]

Impossible, it would affect every user differently

[Strak]

Funny, I seem to have a stereotypical view that anyone below level 20 is not someone worth listening to. Aside from a few exceptions. Pure freaking essence of awesome cancels this rule (eg. Grace/Stocking/Salad Fingers). Unless someone proves they can stand some flaming, hazing, - rep, etc. (in other words, has actually stayed around long enough to reach 20), they are not worthy.

[ramon24bullet]

Im halfway there! XD

[tSwitch]

Funny, I seem to have a stereotypical view that anyone below level 20 is not someone worth listening to. Aside from a few exceptions. Pure freaking essence of awesome cancels this rule (eg. Grace/Stocking/Salad Fingers). Unless someone proves they can stand some flaming, hazing, - rep, etc. (in other words, has actually stayed around long enough to reach 20), they are not worthy.

all of which has nothing to do with levels.

[Strak]

Length of time spent on RMRK since registration?


EDIT: Ah! Here's the quote!

Levels are just a sign as to how much you post and how long you've been a member.

[tSwitch]

I'm saying that criteria for someone being worth listening to has nothing to do with level.

[Strak]

Ah, actually, now that I think about it, that's completely correct. Perfect example in this case is Bio.

However, notice I said "Stereotypical" view.

[ramon24bullet]

Yeah, its all about word choice. Modern Algebra and Roph always talks with reason and meaning, so people listen to what he has to say:)

[Acolyte]

Roph talks with reason and meaning? Since when?