[offtopic]But only a handful of us attempted to keep debate intelligent, which is why it is what it is now.[/offtopic]
My power? I wish I could stay in shape no matter what I did or did not do. It sucks trying to get back into shape.
I'm not so sure about "super humans" and "normal humans" becoming a divided race. We're still humans. Just because I can hear about five times better than most normal people doesn't mean I consider myself superhuman.
Most of these are things that can be conditioned or done with a simple gene splice. As for the blind guy painting... my theory? He's a savant. A lot of people who are blind from birth have amazing depth perception, more so than normal people because they have no sight, and it's more dangerous for them if they can't properly determine the distance to the edge of the road, et cetera. We don't really know how a savant's mind works, but apparently they think of data in colors and shapes. Just because he's blind and hasn't seen what we perceive to be colors doesn't mean his mind can't form its own system of colors. The part of his brain that perceives color is still there, it's just there's nothing sending signals to it.
Actually, to be honest, the only one I was interested in was the blind painter, because studying his mind, along with that other savant guy (who has pretty much none of the drawbacks of being a savant) can help us understand how the mind works.
As for human genetic engineering. I'm not entirely sure on my position when it comes to that. From a religious standpoint it could be said that improving on the human body is wrong, b/c it's like saying God messed up when he made us. However, that is a completely uneducated idea and doesn't really hold up to religious belief. If the Bible did say that it is wrong to improve on the human body, then I would have lost my leg when I broke it, my dad wouldn't be alive today, and millions of others would have died. According to the Bible our bodies are degenerating with each generation due to sin (more diseases, et cetera). Actually, that's how it is according to the 3rd law of thermodynamics as well.
I suppose the politically correct way of saying it would be "supplementing" the human body. Or something like that.
Personally, I think it would be cool to be able to see in the dark, or run faster without breaking a sweat. But we have to remember from a practical standpoint, what we have available to us, criminals will have available as well.