RMRK is retiring.
Registration is disabled. The site will remain online, but eventually become a read-only archive. More information.

RMRK.net has nothing to do with Blockchains, Cryptocurrency or NFTs. We have been around since the early 2000s, but there is a new group using the RMRK name that deals with those things. We have nothing to do with them.
NFTs are a scam, and if somebody is trying to persuade you to buy or invest in crypto/blockchain/NFT content, please turn them down and save your money. See this video for more information.
Parilmentary debate topics.
Pages: [1]

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pokeball KrebelOfflineMale
***
Rep:
Level 86
#1 • Feb 8, 2008
    • This House believes that strong dictatorship is better then weak democracy.

    As posted at a Claremont college website.


    As for who said it, and if it is the UK parliament they are quoting I am unsure.  As they did not post there source. I just seen it while browsing around, and I think it is a good topic to debate. Do any of you believe that a strong dictatorship could work better than a weak democracy?

    As per the definition of what a strong dictatorship or weak democracy would mean, I am unsure as well. Although I would also like to hear what you think that they would mean.
    Monkeys work better than zombies.
    Pages: [1]