RMRK is retiring.
Registration is disabled. The site will remain online, but eventually become a read-only archive. More information.

RMRK.net has nothing to do with Blockchains, Cryptocurrency or NFTs. We have been around since the early 2000s, but there is a new group using the RMRK name that deals with those things. We have nothing to do with them.
NFTs are a scam, and if somebody is trying to persuade you to buy or invest in crypto/blockchain/NFT content, please turn them down and save your money. See this video for more information.
What game do you think would've been better off not existing?
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  All

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

pokeball biohazardOfflineFemale
********
Absolutely the one chosen by fadark
Rep:
Level 94
GAAAAAAAAY
#76 • Jun 12, 2007
    • I didn't buy that.
    pokeball VenomOfflineMale
    ***
    Rep:
    Level 89
    No Cake For you!
    #77 • Jun 13, 2007
    • My Taste for games in huge more than most people i range from starcraft to super mario even back to colicovison which i still have
    pokeball HolyQuebecOfflineMale
    ****
    GG FUCKING FAGGOT
    Rep:
    Level 88
    Lulz.
    #78 • Jan 11, 2008
    • Summoner 2 and big rigs.
    pokeball gazonaOfflineMale
    **
    Rep: +0/-0Level 88
    #79 • Feb 6, 2008
    • EVO on the ps1 oh how i hate that game. OH GOD IT ANNOYED ME EVERY TIME I LOOKED AT IT. I honestly smashed that game to pieces
    pokeball Django DurangoOfflineFemale
    **
    Rep: +0/-0Level 86
    #80 • Jul 9, 2008
    • Wave Race 64. I always hear people talk about how awesome this game was. I cannot see why. I had Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit as well and thought it was shit.

    I had that Spiderman/X-Men game someone mentioned earlier. I could never get past the first level. Of course, I was, like, eight at the time.

    So far as movie games go, one of my favorite games ever is a movie game. The Warriors for the win. The problem with movie games, as I see it, is that the reason most of them are made is so that they can tie-in with a new release in order to cash in on the PR at the time. Rockstar owned the rights to make a game based on the movie for years before they actually did it. (I think I read somewhere that it is the favorite movie of a lot of the heads there.)
    pokeball Shiriko1989OfflineFemale
    ***
    Rep:
    Level 85
    ... X0X...
    #81 • Jul 9, 2008
    • Halo 3... I had tested and it is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo BAD that I dunno how to say how bad it is....
    pokeball Dwarra?OfflineMale
    *
    Rep:
    Level 97
    Secret Santa 2013 ParticipantSecret Santa 2012 Participant2011 Most Successful Troll
    #82 • Jul 9, 2008
    • Quote from: Django Durango on July 09, 2008, 10:13:34 AM
    Wave Race 64. I always hear people talk about how awesome this game was. I cannot see why. I had Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit as well and thought it was shit.

    I had that Spiderman/X-Men game someone mentioned earlier. I could never get past the first level. Of course, I was, like, eight at the time.

    So far as movie games go, one of my favorite games ever is a movie game. The Warriors for the win. The problem with movie games, as I see it, is that the reason most of them are made is so that they can tie-in with a new release in order to cash in on the PR at the time. Rockstar owned the rights to make a game based on the movie for years before they actually did it. (I think I read somewhere that it is the favorite movie of a lot of the heads there.)
    Please don't necropost again (post in a topic older than 3 months).
    Also Shiriko, I already warned you, but since he posted first I'll let it slide. I'm locking this topic since it was just a big argument anyways.
    Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  All