So your rebuttal is... giving us carefully constructed (and essentially meaningless) answers to carefully constructed questions put together by a group of men who treat women like sexual objects, claim they don't, but obviously feel the need to prove they aren't doing this?
Agh... fine, I'm only doing this once more, and if you aren't going to bother telling us why anyone should listen to you, then I'm just going to pretend you don't exist.
First: the definition of seduction:
1 : to persuade to disobedience or disloyalty
2 : to lead astray usually by persuasion or false promises3 : to carry out the physical seduction of : entice to sexual intercourse
As if that wasn't enough on its own:
http://www.fastseduction.com/cgi-bin/search.cgi?action=retrieve&grp=1&mn=98809974598809
testimonial from pua who used the door pattern (my sig)
Again, just because it's on the internet doesn't make it true. And testimonials don't mean anything except when you're on trial. If all those commercials on TV with testimonials from people for all those amazing new products and gadgets and those get rich quick schemes were true, then I would have a radio that worked, and there would be a whole lot more rich people in the world. The same applies here.
here is the original pattern, not even a full page so have a look, maybe skim through some other ones.
http://www.fastseduction.com/guide/03_approaching/11_the_patterns/p_door.shtml
As Blizzard said before (maybe in a different topic), it sounds like a scene from a bad movie.
I'm not even going to try and argue that my views are right against some of you who criticize me.
Then you must think that what you're doing is wrong. Either that or you think it's no use because you won't change our minds. In that case, why are you still trying to persuade us?
Like I said I'm here only to help you all, and I welcome criticism. As for proof that it works, i already have it. If you seen what a normal day in HS for me was like back when i was a sophomore, and then compared it to when i was a jr. after learning pua there would not be a doubt in your mind.
Excellent proof! Let me just get my "Scenes from the past viewer" out of the desk here... oh wait, it only works on people I know in real life. Fiddlesticks!
Oh, so now we're into those carefully constructed questions and answers I was talking about. I don't feel much like replying to these, as I wouldn't really be replying to you... but, in the sport of pointing out stupidity, I'll give it a go:
*Does this course require I be mean/cruel/a jerk to women? I sure don't
want to do that! *
Well, essentially, yes it does. Not overtly, of course. It wouldn't make much sense then, now would it? But let's see what the great people at PUA have to say:
Absolutely, 100% NO! It's true, most men when they "date" have to choose
between being a "bully"...a "jerk" who never gives in or a
"supplicant"...a beggar who does ANYTHING a woman wants.
To be able to say most men have to do that means there must have been extensive studies, so... where's the proof? In my 21 years of life, the only men I've seen trying to get women by being a bully or a jerk have only been on television.
My course gives you the option to be a truly gentle-MAN; someone who NEVER bullies or
BEGS,
So now this is a course on etiquette and manners?
but instead structures wonderful opportunities, offers her
challenges, and captivates and stimulates her deepest levels of
imagination.
In short, manipulation.
that's not being cruel; that's being awesome.
In some ways, that's being a rapist too.
And you deserve to be know how good it feels for you and her to do this.
And you would know how she feels... how? Maybe at first, before she realizes you've manipulated her into having sex with you, she's happy, maybe even a false sense of love, but after you leave and she finds out you've used her... well, when does that part get mentioned?
*Speed Seducers are just using women.*
WELL DUH
Speed Seduction makes no determination as to the specific goals of a
given relationship that an individual may choose to have.
Hello, Naphe.
In other words, this just means "Yes, we're just using women, but we can't come out and say it."
It may be sexual, it may not. It may be long term or short term. It might be
mutually fulfilling or one sided. These are decisions made by the
individual, and not determined by the material.
o.....k..... Again, this means nothing. It's just a failsafe in case of unexpected results.
*Speed Seduction leaves women feeling hurt.*
Well, not unless they find out they're being used, of course. Otherwise, they're completely oblivious to you manipulating them.
Speed Seducers have worked extensively to come up with methods that have
exactly the opposite effect.
Manipulation, manipulation, manipulation. How many times must I say it?
Major Mark created a pattern that actually
allows a woman to continue to experience the positive aspect of the
relationship, even after you're no longer together.
And this would have nothing to do with hormones, or anything scientific or psychological... or maybe, BRAINWASHING?
*The feelings crated with Speed Seduction aren't genuine they are just
memories.*
... WHAT!? I'm not understanding what's being said here. You mean the feeling the girl feels towards you aren't real, they're memories of past relationships? Hell, that's just stupid and doesn't make any sense.
Speed Seduction does both.
-.-
It calls on emotions a woman has already felt
to recreate the emotional state and it uses a variety of methods to
create new emotional states. You are not just limited to things she's
previously felt. You're only limit is the depth of her imagination and
the degree of her desire.
Seriously, the manipulation here is getting old. Any new "techniques"?
*Does ordering this course make me a "loser?" What are your typical
students like? *
Of course it makes you a loser! And our typical students are your everyday scumbag, who can't get girls without a bag full of tricks. They're shallow, egotistical, manipulative, mean, and will most likely have herpes before they're 23. Not to mention, they'd probably become rapists if it were legal.
My students range from 18 to gentlemen in their 70's!
lol... wait, you said you're only 17. o_O
Many are highly
successful and busy professionals, including surgeons, chiropractors,
lawyers, engineers, etc.
And what difference does this make? If it's just some way to validate this, then it's a lame way of doing so. "Well, gee, if there are so many successful men doing this, it must work!"
Some are what the press would typically expect,
needing some serious guidance when it comes to attracting women, but by
far the majority are men who have done quite well in life, are very busy,
and don't have time for the hit and miss dating nonsense that just
doesn't work very well for ANY man.
And how can that even be said? It doesn't work very well for ANY man? LOL, ok. I think this one speaks for itself.
In my way of viewing things, the only "losers" in life are those who keep
doing the same old thing they've been doing, over and over, hoping to get
a different result!
Actually, that would be the definition of insane, not loser.
Winners recognize there is a better way and take
action...right NOW! Today!
This reminds me of some bad commercial on the radio or TV.
Oh... nothing else to respond too... I was enjoying it this time. You've proven to be to be nothing more than a manipulator, if anything you've claimed is even true
And during my reply, I see we have another one here... oh boy.