So you don't believe in air or oxygen, ok
Actually this was a pretty funny example of disproving since both air and oxygen are both visible and can be sensed under specific conditions. All involving eyes. Specially air. Taking my words so literally isn't the best of methods in discussion but since you go for it I might as well compare air with ghosts. Both visible under specific conditions, hmmm?
Everything can be observed in one way or another, but you can't directly see them. Gravity, for example, is invisible but you can infer its existence by seeing objects fall towards the ground.
Thanks for supporting my point.
I wasn't trying to make a joke. Why did you go on and on about something and then finish it by saying that you thought it wasn't real?
Nope, I took three points of view, twice divided the situation and took effort to explain a thing or two. Unlike you who searches through a comment, takes one sentence out, picks a suitable questions and ignores everything else relevant, I take myself time to actually try to explain why and howcome.
Not a religious belief? You believe that there are higher powers and that you can interact with them using rituals.
Just the way you believe we can't. And no, you don't know that. You believe that.
You wanted to drag the dictionary into this, eh? Well how would you define "ghost"? I think the dictionary's definition is pretty accurate and unbiased:
"the soul of a dead person, a disembodied spirit imagined, usually as a vague, shadowy or evanescent form, as wandering among or haunting living persons."
If this isn't accurate then I want you to come up with a definition so that you can't hide behind "that isn't what I meant by 'ghost'".
You took that from a dictionary? Then you supported my point right. What does it say? "Usually as a vague, shadowy or evanescent form, as wandering among or haunting living persons"
So you believe what it says? If you believe what the dictionary says, how can you claim there's no such thing? Oh, you want to tell me that ghosts can also be imagined and made up in stories or movies and that the creator of dictionary took liberty to explain them as seen in movies and described in stories? That's a pretty pathetic work on dictionary, then. With that kind of work he might as well write down Magneto and describe fearsome x-man villain.
You aren't a cynical corpse that goes through life without selfrespect and does what others tell ywou, no? Then you probably have principes and beliefs of your own, yes? Some, or most of them, probably involve religious aspects of anykind, even just a common theory of love, no, yes? I might as well call you a believer. Following this, everything in the world is a belief and a matter of perspective, yes? If so, I guess ghosts and magic are religious belief. If no, then you talk nonsense. Heh.
So because I don't think ghosts are real I have no self-respect? No, believing love is real is not religious belief. There is a difference between believing things that can be observed and proven and believing things that can only be proven to people who think the same way you do.
Completely misplaced conclusion (with already concluded reason). As for the other part of the reply, ok so what actually makes you a person whose belief that those things do not exist right on this matter? Do you have any proof that these things
do not exist? No. Absolutely not. While, strangely enough, I at least offer you some kind of logical explanation why something occurs or does not occur, and while, strangely enough, people do eventually atleast show some kind of photography, all you do, on a contrary, is say "That's made up." and suddenly you are right. My ass. I'm looking at all of your replies here (and took time to check yours in other topics) and not once did you ever offer anykind of really, really well argumented complaint. All you do is negate things. The fact I can write 10,000 words about it, and you take out one sentence and ask a question over which I can discuss with additional 10,000 words on which you reply with "Inane babble" is pretty pathetic for someone who is desperate to offend a person thinking to know or believing into something you don't find fit.
Yeah, I've got this kooky fetish for things that are real. The fact that animals emit small amount of electricity is common knowledge (you could have gotten that from The Matrix, although human brains do not generate enough energy to actually affect anything). Animals don't radiate magnetism, although migratory animals can sense the Earth's poles and use them to navigate north and south. Our muscles contract. Do you mean static electricity?
The magnetism is all-present in this world. And duh, "contacts". It's all about contacts and reaction. You perhaps don't believe in meditation and budism, then? How do you explain their floating above the ground when reaching ultimate state of mind? And if you by any chance think this is bullshit, think twice for they recorded them. Live. Or do you think that's yet another conspiracy and they altered the video? There are "things" in this world we are not aware of. Take that into concern next time.
Or something called "intuition" which does not originate from static electricity.
I never said it does, lol.
It's pretty convenient that the only devices which work around these beings are the the most undependable.
Yes, I expected that coming. So instead of undependable devices, when people speak of ghosts in the time when there were no devices to record with, you'll say they made it up. And in the time of primtive tribalism, it was their primitivity. That's really convenient from you, too. You sound like the new pope. Rock is evil. Lol, right.
Since when do drunk people always see white mice?
Since the day of begining. Ofcourse not always and ofcourse not everyone but they do. And it's always white mices. For the difference, prisoners, (or anyone held that way) in those rooms where they spend a long time alone, always see ants. Walking around the room, attacking, eating them, walking over them, etc. Always.
By the way, I cut out that inane babble about angels and demons because it was, well, inane babble.
Yes, this was also very smart from you, expected as well. "inane babble". You didn't study it. You know nothing about it. You don't even care. You never presented anykind of argument. Yet mine is babble, and you are right. Lol. Our new pope.