The RPG Maker Resource Kit
RMRK General => Creativity => Topic started by: pacdiggity on February 28, 2015, 09:18:33 AM
-
It's been quite a long time since I've shared my music here, so I thought I would show off something I'm very proud of. I wrote this, the first movement of a symphony I've dubbed 'Chaos', in October last year as my first proper full orchestral score. It got me in to the composition course I wanted and that's all I've wanted in life the past two years, so good. The theme is actually based off of an RM RTP track 8) which I've always loved and wanted to expand on. Please enjoy this, my eruptive first attempt at orchestral writing.
CAUTION: This piece contains many tritones, do not expose to small children. Also I think it's pretty loud, I recommend being cautious with your speakers before your eardrums implode.
For those who care, this is a Sibelius Sounds rendition, infinitely better than a MIDI file, but still far from realistic. The exposition is not repeated in this rendition, but for clarity's sake I'll say that it repeats at around 1:30 back to the start for a total of ~8:15
-
Ooo I was going to ask you next time you were in IRC how your composing has been going. I can't listen until tomorrow night, but I will post as soon as I do.
-
Oh hey, that's one of the "main boss" themes right? That's really cool. ;8
-
dude, pacman this is sexy music ;o
I like it! You should make more o.o
-
Oh hey, that's one of the "main boss" themes right? That's really cool. ;8
If I remember correctly it's FinalBoss4 or something. It was always my favourite, even a whole decade ago. It's such an awesome theme, I've always wanted to do something with it.
dude, pacman this is sexy music ;o
I like it! You should make more o.o
I'm currently working on a second movement that notably isn't based on an RPG Maker track.
Ooo I was going to ask you next time you were in IRC how your composing has been going. I can't listen until tomorrow night, but I will post as soon as I do.
Truth be told I only posted this so I could make you proud senpai ;8
-
Incredibly well written. I regularly have daydreams of composing entire scores in whole note scales and hearing this scratched that itch again. The only thing I could recommend is to make the percussion a bit more dynamic, since it seems relegated to the background, but I'm not even really sure that would improve it or not. Either way, I'm impressed!
-
I thought I commented on this, but this is pretty great. Well done. You are very talented.
-
Incredibly well written. I regularly have daydreams of composing entire scores in whole note scales and hearing this scratched that itch again. The only thing I could recommend is to make the percussion a bit more dynamic, since it seems relegated to the background, but I'm not even really sure that would improve it or not. Either way, I'm impressed!
Thank you old friend. I agree with your point about the percussion - the score is still very much in development, and the two main things that are changing are percussion and detailed articulations. When I picture this being performed I can only picture it with more auxiliary percussion. Hearing this from you is heartwarming.
I thought I commented on this, but this is pretty great. Well done. You are very talented.
Thank you. It's easy to doubt oneself when you're your own sole critic. I spent a lot of the time writing this worrying that what I was doing was indecipherable nonsense. It's comforting to hear this from people, especially those who haven't known me long.
-
It's sooooo nicely composed~
I fav'd it on SoundCloud yesterday, but now I just got a chance to write a post here. ^^"
Good job on that.
-
Well first off, if I didn't know you played a woodwind instrument I would have known from this!
Very nice work overall. It's exciting and interesting. I particularly like how rhythmic it is, but I'm a percussionist so I'm kind of biased. Which leads me to Malson's comment about adding more percussion. It's ultimately up to you, of course, but it is strange hearing such a rhythmic and tense piece with so little percussion in it. There are a lot of opportunities for auxiliary percussion throughout the entire movement. I liked how you used the pitched percussion, though.
The transition at ~3:25 from horns to woodwinds (or chaos to tranquility if that's your intention) is a bit confusing to me. I understand the idea but it feels like it's not executed in the best way. It seems like, again, extra percussion leading and building up to it would help a lot. Think cymbal, gong, bass drum, and/or timpani rolls (I don't know how extensive the percussion is in Sibelius Essentials) that end with the suspended note from the French Horn. It also seems that Sibelius might not be interpreting dynamics well (or at all - Sibelius can be dumb like that) there and if it were actually performed by musicians I'm sure they could smooth that out witch crescendos/dimenuendos. The way it is might be your intention, though, and that's certainly fine, but that was my impression when it got to that point.
Anyway, super good job. Now for the next movement!
-
Well first off, if I didn't know you played a woodwind instrument I would have known from this!
Strings bore me ;)
Very nice work overall. It's exciting and interesting. I particularly like how rhythmic it is, but I'm a percussionist so I'm kind of biased. Which leads me to Malson's comment about adding more percussion. It's ultimately up to you, of course, but it is strange hearing such a rhythmic and tense piece with so little percussion in it. There are a lot of opportunities for auxiliary percussion throughout the entire movement. I liked how you used the pitched percussion, though.
I think I really like using instruments other than percussion for intense rhythms and reserve percussion for more colourful and textural reasons. I do love percussion and how much it can add very easily - there were a lot of times I thought of using a ratchet here, or a triangle there, hell, let's throw a vibraphone over there. It turned out the way it did because I restricted my usage of it, and because it sounds really shit on Sibelius. I do see where a gong or a bass drum could be very effective, but as I've said the score is far from finished.
I sincerely believe that the timpani is the most powerful and effective instrument in an orchestra.
The transition at ~3:25 from horns to woodwinds (or chaos to tranquility if that's your intention) is a bit confusing to me. I understand the idea but it feels like it's not executed in the best way. It seems like, again, extra percussion leading and building up to it would help a lot. Think cymbal, gong, bass drum, and/or timpani rolls (I don't know how extensive the percussion is in Sibelius Essentials) that end with the suspended note from the French Horn. It also seems that Sibelius might not be interpreting dynamics well (or at all - Sibelius can be dumb like that) there and if it were actually performed by musicians I'm sure they could smooth that out witch crescendos/dimenuendos. The way it is might be your intention, though, and that's certainly fine, but that was my impression when it got to that point.
The idea is that it grows louder and more chaotic until the horns stick out and suddenly the entire mood changes, and I firmly agree with you saying that this is where more percussion is needed. I love that tension hanging in the air followed by the ecstasy of tonality. Sibelius certainly doesn't interpret it perfectly - the oboe is actually supposed to come in under the horns instead of after, and the horns are supposed to hold the note in to the new section.
Anyway, super good job. Now for the next movement!
Thank you. The next movement is going to be an exercise in harmony more than anything else (a lecturer once told me that it's impossible to write a piece in the Locrian mode and I'm on a quest to prove him wrong). If you'll indulge me, I'm focused on using the full dim7 chord as a pivot between 4 different minor keys, because it's a symmetrical chord and can act as the dominant of all four keys, which is super interesting to me. Basically the piece is based around the chord of E, G, Bb and C# pivoting between B, D, F and G# minor. It's a weird concept but I'm hoping it's stable enough to hold together and still be called tonal.
-
Well first off, if I didn't know you played a woodwind instrument I would have known from this!
Strings bore me ;)
lol. My orchestra pieces tend to be more wind heavy than standard orchestral work, too. Giving the melody to a woodwind instrument sounds a lot better to me than to strings usually. Except for solo string instruments.
Very nice work overall. It's exciting and interesting. I particularly like how rhythmic it is, but I'm a percussionist so I'm kind of biased. Which leads me to Malson's comment about adding more percussion. It's ultimately up to you, of course, but it is strange hearing such a rhythmic and tense piece with so little percussion in it. There are a lot of opportunities for auxiliary percussion throughout the entire movement. I liked how you used the pitched percussion, though.
I think I really like using instruments other than percussion for intense rhythms and reserve percussion for more colourful and textural reasons. I do love percussion and how much it can add very easily - there were a lot of times I thought of using a ratchet here, or a triangle there, hell, let's throw a vibraphone over there. It turned out the way it did because I restricted my usage of it, and because it sounds really shit on Sibelius. I do see where a gong or a bass drum could be very effective, but as I've said the score is far from finished.
I sincerely believe that the timpani is the most powerful and effective instrument in an orchestra.[/quote]
Oh I missed the part where you said it wasn't finished. My bad.
Restriction can sometimes be good. And I don't think the "lack" of percussion is necessarily bad. I guess I just can't help but listen to something and think of all the different percussion that could be added.
The transition at ~3:25 from horns to woodwinds (or chaos to tranquility if that's your intention) is a bit confusing to me. I understand the idea but it feels like it's not executed in the best way. It seems like, again, extra percussion leading and building up to it would help a lot. Think cymbal, gong, bass drum, and/or timpani rolls (I don't know how extensive the percussion is in Sibelius Essentials) that end with the suspended note from the French Horn. It also seems that Sibelius might not be interpreting dynamics well (or at all - Sibelius can be dumb like that) there and if it were actually performed by musicians I'm sure they could smooth that out witch crescendos/dimenuendos. The way it is might be your intention, though, and that's certainly fine, but that was my impression when it got to that point.
The idea is that it grows louder and more chaotic until the horns stick out and suddenly the entire mood changes, and I firmly agree with you saying that this is where more percussion is needed. I love that tension hanging in the air followed by the ecstasy of tonality. Sibelius certainly doesn't interpret it perfectly - the oboe is actually supposed to come in under the horns instead of after, and the horns are supposed to hold the note in to the new section.
[/quote]
Okay that makes more sense, and I think that's an excellent choice musically. I figured it was something like that but I really wasn't sure. I love Sibelius but sometimes its playback really sucks unless you spend more time than it's arguably worth making it sound kind of almost decent.
Anyway, super good job. Now for the next movement!
Thank you. The next movement is going to be an exercise in harmony more than anything else (a lecturer once told me that it's impossible to write a piece in the Locrian mode and I'm on a quest to prove him wrong). If you'll indulge me, I'm focused on using the full dim7 chord as a pivot between 4 different minor keys, because it's a symmetrical chord and can act as the dominant of all four keys, which is super interesting to me. Basically the piece is based around the chord of E, G, Bb and C# pivoting between B, D, F and G# minor. It's a weird concept but I'm hoping it's stable enough to hold together and still be called tonal.
Locrian mode, huh. That's certainly a big task ahead of you. I definitely wouldn't say it's impossible, especially if you just forgo tonality. Hmm interesting. You know, I've never actually given using Locrian mode much thought. I guess you've probably already realized it, but it seems to me the biggest problem in writing a tonal piece in Lorcian mode would be in keeping it from sounding like it isn't in Locrian mode (or another key). But that's part of the fun, right? I think your idea for it is really interesting, actually, and I look forward to hearing it, assuming it actually works lol. Good luck!
-
I really enjoyed this.