Anski is dumb when it comes to most things.
Oh ho ho~ Like I'm offended by something I've heard a few hundred times.Anski is dumb when it comes to most things.
how about you just keep sticking things through your dickgap to see if they fit.
Anski is dumb when it comes to most things.
Neat website, Arlen. I'm not huge fan of having a background image (http://ryanleber.com/design/background.jpg) though. But it's pretty easy to navigate, and I love your music. :3
internet-friendly hex color
.oneColElsCtrHdr #mainContent {
height:auto;
width: 800px;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
background: #B0B0B0 url(background.jpg) no-repeat;
border: 1px solid #000000;
z-index: 2;
}I'm not questioning why he uses it, I'm questioning why he's not using a more efficient alternative.The Quicktime format was practically made for internet movies, Malson.
I'm not questioning why he uses it, I'm questioning why he's not using a more efficient alternative.The Quicktime format was practically made for internet movies, Malson.
It's only not efficient because you don't want to download a tiny little application to run it.
Even back in 1999, the install base of the flash player was 92 percent of all Internet users (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Flash).
That page doesn't have newer numbers, and I can't be bothered to find them lol. Quicktime's is much, much lower.
You could encode a high or low quality quicktime movie just like you could encode a high or low quality flash movie, and if you encoded a flash movie FROM an already compressed quicktime movie it would be bad.
FLash 7 uses sorenson video, which is shit, but Flash 8's standard video format is Vp6, which is h.264 based. Quicktime is h.264 based also, so they're basically the same.
Flash is pretty much an internet standard, quicktime is not, no matter how much apple wishes it was.
I can't be bothered to write more lol, nor do I care, QT Alternative works ok.
[edit] [17:28] <Ego> Did you make sure to add that QuickTime player doesn't do anything unique?