The RPG Maker Resource Kit

RMRK General => Video Games and Entertainment => Topic started by: Holkeye on July 08, 2011, 04:13:13 AM

Title: Classics of Game
Post by: Holkeye on July 08, 2011, 04:13:13 AM
These need to be seen. I'm not going to explain them, just watch them.

http://www.youtube.com/user/ClassicsOfGame#p/u (http://www.youtube.com/user/ClassicsOfGame#p/u)
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: pacdiggity on July 08, 2011, 07:25:34 AM
I think you should explain them.
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: Dwarra? on July 08, 2011, 08:00:09 AM
The Witcher one was hilarious to me because I actually recently experienced that creepy adult voiced girl.
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: exhydra on July 08, 2011, 08:05:59 AM
Aah, I could watch these all day. Number seventeen is currently my favorite.

Oh man, number fourteen too ... also ten.
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: hiromu656 on July 08, 2011, 05:06:47 PM
Save turtles!
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: strike on July 08, 2011, 09:25:52 PM
Things like this tend to need presentation. some are funny on their own but others just seem like "welp here is a clip from a shitty game no one ever played, laugh at it."
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: Holkeye on July 08, 2011, 09:45:15 PM
The lack of presentation is exactly what makes it funny.
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: pacdiggity on July 08, 2011, 11:17:41 PM
On the contrary, what Strike posted.
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: exhydra on July 08, 2011, 11:54:04 PM
People have different senses of humor, and I'm not wearing any pants. Film at eleven (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHzWBLHAbFg).
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: Kokowam on July 09, 2011, 01:22:15 AM
I'm with Strike on this one. Some of these are funny for sure, but some definitely need some presentation.
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: Holkeye on July 09, 2011, 02:05:59 AM
Any sort of lame commentary would diminish the absurdity of it.
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: pacdiggity on July 09, 2011, 02:17:38 AM
I understand why it would be lame, but I don't understand why it has to be.
But I think the sheer randomness of it's funnier without a presentation. And I believe that's the point. Of course, I'll never know that because there's no presentation telling me exactly what to think.
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: Holkeye on July 09, 2011, 02:42:41 AM
That's the point. If you get it, you get it. If you don't, then oh well. There's no need for someone saying, "Here's some funny clips from games." It goes without saying.
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: Dwarra? on July 09, 2011, 10:12:12 AM
You guys are over thinking it.
I'm with Holk on this one.

[spoiler]Pro Skud[/spoiler]
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: pacdiggity on July 09, 2011, 10:38:50 AM
Of course we're over thinking it, how else would we be able to find fault in this otherwise simplistically hilarious matter?
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: Acolyte on July 09, 2011, 07:15:44 PM
They could at least tell you what the game is in the description.
Title: Re: Classics of Game
Post by: strike on July 10, 2011, 04:46:18 AM
all i ask is a bit of background on the game. the narration need be nothing else, hell it could just be in=the description of the video all "this is from herpderp a 1997 ps1 game made in japan"