http://www.actiontrip.com/rei/filedownload.phtml?link=enemyterritoryquakewars&platform=pc&type=demo&size=727MB&datum=2007-09-10&description=#
Your Welcome.
..... um yeah why not just use filefront much quicker
Doesn't filefront cost money?
Not if you download for free... And you never gave any insight to what this is..
The title says quake wars demo released, i assumed you people could take a hint on what the link is.
;9
I can't play the beta because my computer isn't good enough.
Woot, I'm downloading this now. (Well, I actually already was. It's online, right?)
i hope so. My pc froze when it was at like 80%....COCK FAG ASS TIT CUNT FUCK
Wait... so are we gonna play on the official server, or a pirate one?
Quote from: The.Muffin.King on September 10, 2007, 10:50:41 PM
i hope so. My pc froze when it was at like 80%....COCK FAG ASS TIT CUNT FUCK
Man, it's the video game section. Don't say all this, my conditions for comp-crashing are worse than yours and i never say anything bout this peice of shit.
Right my bad about the "language". That was my way of telling you its not finished for me yet.
Well, I was playing it, and it looks great, but I couldn't find a server that had more than a few people that my ping was under 100 for : /
On the bright side, the bots seemed at least somewhat decent.
ok this is good, it might get better if i actually manage to get the hand of it.
This is soo fun.
i tried to download it .. no luck i had better luck with Tremulous
Which would be better? Quake Wars or Halo Wars?
I'd say H.Wars even though I hate the Halo series.
after playing bioshock halo has sucked for me.
ANd i'd say quake because quake is awesome.
Halo always sucked. I have two retarded fanboys who call themselves gamers in my class, that says halo 1 and 2 are better than half life two. Neither of them have actually played half life for any amount of time. Half life one is better than halo 3, ffs.
Quote from: biohazard on September 14, 2007, 01:16:25 AM
Halo always sucked. I have two retarded fanboys who call themselves gamers in my class, that says halo 1 and 2 are better than half life two. Neither of them have actually played half life for any amount of time. Half life one is better than halo 3, ffs.
Agreed, yet I have a place in my haert for RTS games.
Quote from: EVAProject01 on September 14, 2007, 01:27:50 AM
Quote from: biohazard on September 14, 2007, 01:16:25 AM
Halo always sucked. I have two retarded fanboys who call themselves gamers in my class, that says halo 1 and 2 are better than half life two. Neither of them have actually played half life for any amount of time. Half life one is better than halo 3, ffs.
Agreed, yet I have a place in my haert for RTS games.
Would you say advanced wars of ff tactics advance are rts?
Adv. wars, yes, FFT, no.
well i love advanced wars. I've beat 2 and 3.
Quote from: biohazard on September 14, 2007, 01:16:25 AM
Halo always sucked. I have two retarded fanboys who call themselves gamers in my class, that says halo 1 and 2 are better than half life two. Neither of them have actually played half life for any amount of time. Half life one is better than halo 3, ffs.
Rep+
Quote from: EVAProject01 on September 14, 2007, 02:22:20 AM
Adv. wars, yes, FFT, no.
Neither.
RTS is real-time. They're both grid-based turn based strategy games.
I'm going to say that Quake Wars and Halo Wars are incomparable because they're from two different genres. A better comparison would be Quake Wars and UT III, which is also undecidable because UT III isn't out and doesn't have a demo out.
Quote from: Lord Dante on September 14, 2007, 10:49:51 PM
Quote from: EVAProject01 on September 14, 2007, 02:22:20 AM
Adv. wars, yes, FFT, no.
Neither.
RTS is real-time. They're both grid-based turn based strategy games.
I'm going to say that Quake Wars and Halo Wars are incomparable because they're from two different genres. A better comparison would be Quake Wars and UT III, which is also undecidable because UT III isn't out and doesn't have a demo out.
Then why mention UT III?
I just was suggesting a game that's gameplay is closer. Although, QW and Battlefield games are even more comparable...
Yeah i'd agree to that, from what i've seen from 2910, i think thats the number...
Quote from: The.Muffin.King on September 15, 2007, 12:45:08 AM
Yeah i'd agree to that, from what i've seen from 2910, i think thats the number...
I thought it was 2142....unless there's a sequel...
Quote from: Bunbury on September 15, 2007, 01:13:05 AM
Quote from: The.Muffin.King on September 15, 2007, 12:45:08 AM
Yeah i'd agree to that, from what i've seen from 2910, i think thats the number...
I thought it was 2142....unless there's a sequel...
Quote from: Bunbury on September 15, 2007, 01:13:05 AM
Quote from: The.Muffin.King on September 15, 2007, 12:45:08 AM
Yeah i'd agree to that, from what i've seen from 2910, i think thats the number...
I thought it was 2142....unless there's a sequel...
no, he means 2142. For some reason i always thought it was 2910 as well :P
Actually, the battlefield games are all very similar. I haven;t played alot of QW yet, but the gameplay seems to be alot more structured in it than in Battlefield.
the ground looks like ass in this game :)
yeah, that's true...I was noting that the "unparalleled graphical quality" applied more to player models and vehicles :P