i would define good according to my Super Ego (the moral decision making process in our mind). Good is good and bad is bad. Killing a human and eating him is wrong even if it is cultural. What do you gain from eating a human? Pride, victory, self confidence? No offense, but i think this is the same way for gay people. I think that laws should go against them because gay people are focused on sexual desires. They are gay because they like men, that is the only difference. They value sexual desires some much that they see themselves as a people. you like men because you want engage in intercourse with them, not to be friends or have a good time. If you did, you can a friend who is a girl. As you can see here, to a gay person it is okay to be gay, but the another it is not. We have to understand and see the real purpose of ones actions and determine if it is good or not. Many people would terrorist are freedom fighters, but in reality, terrorists kill more civilians then armies. If they truly want to be freedom fighters, they should attack the enemy only or use the power of speech. You can't be a freedom fighter if you kill your own people. Religion is corrupt but some parts aren't. Being good, respecting elders and parents, does that seem corrupt to you? The key points of religion are not about how the world was created or who is better, it is how to be good. What is corrupt is who is better, how deserves to live or die. These concepts contradict religion totally. If Islam is about peace, then why does it say that all non-believers should be converted or killed. Those who do not believe in Allah are doomed to hell. Everyone is different and everybody will not bow down the same way. If you enter a room with 100 people and tell them to look right (with a mike to project you voice when everybody is listening), 30% will turn right, 30% will ask why, 10% will look left, 10% will not listen, and 10% will ask what was the question.