Not at all. I don't recall reading or posting anything like that about homosexuals, for one thing. For another, I never said not having intimacy was wrong- any relationship expert will tell you it's an important component of a long term relationship, that's all.
As far as objectionable is concerned, I just said it was counter-productive to finding stability with another person. I feel that there cannot be the level of trust that intimacy demands in a relationship where you never know when your other will go out and nail someone else. Intimacy can exist even in threesome or greater situations, I suppose, as long as it's a closed relationship.
tl;dr: I feel that intimacy can only exist in an exclusive relationship, and looking for it elsewhere is plain silly.
Keep a homosexuality argument to another thread if it's going to turn into a chemical fire topic. You have the right to argue and draw in from other sources, but don't start being embitter over topics that aren't as related as you'd think.
I'm not condemning it as much as I am saying that it never works, and someone will inevitably get hurt.
While I see your point, I am inclined to point out that it seems none of us can identify an instance where it actually works. :s Hence my original point, that it seems to be more destructive than constructive and beneficial.
Marriage and sticking to the same partners is not natural and is a VERY recent thing in the evolution of humans.I'm a have to call bullshit. Ducks, you know those duck things - quack - they mate for life. And they have for thousands of years. Ergo it's natural - no human intervention.
Marriage and sticking to the same partners is not natural and is a VERY recent thing in the evolution of humans.I'm a have to call bullshit. Ducks, you know those duck things - quack - they mate for life. And they have for thousands of years. Ergo it's natural - no human intervention.
So, in a way being with one partner for your life is natural, I'm not quite sure if that's the case in humans though. We must've had the idea from somewhere!
Marriage and sticking to the same partners is not natural and is a VERY recent thing in the evolution of humans.
Marriage and sticking to the same partners is not natural and is a VERY recent thing in the evolution of humans.
'Very recent'? Like, before recorded history? Ancient Egyptians had unions similar to marriage. There are theories that it goes back even further. That's pretty much like saying religion is very recent.
Marriage and sticking to the same partners is not natural and is a VERY recent thing in the evolution of humans.
'Very recent'? Like, before recorded history? Ancient Egyptians had unions similar to marriage. There are theories that it goes back even further. That's pretty much like saying religion is very recent.
Yea, I mean recent in evolution. So yes, before recorded history.
And even if we take into account humans evolved to be able to rationalise and think, that still doesn't explain why open relationships are wrong. Oh, and IN recorded history open relationships were accepted in many cultures.
Marriage and sticking to the same partners is not natural and is a VERY recent thing in the evolution of humans.
'Very recent'? Like, before recorded history? Ancient Egyptians had unions similar to marriage. There are theories that it goes back even further. That's pretty much like saying religion is very recent.
Yea, I mean recent in evolution. So yes, before recorded history.
And even if we take into account humans evolved to be able to rationalise and think, that still doesn't explain why open relationships are wrong. Oh, and IN recorded history open relationships were accepted in many cultures.
You could also argue that clothing is unnatural, or bathing, or any other thing that's been around since the babylonians, but it wouldn't be a good argument. You can't argue that something is right because it was done a long time ago. Slavery was accepted up until a time that you could actually call recent, as well as a whole myriad of other bad things. I think a person should have a right to choose what kind of relationship they want to be in, but I think that one person should really be enough. It just seems selfish to me.
You could also argue that clothing is unnatural, or bathing.Clothing is basically unnatural. Not wearing any though obviously isn't widely accepted. It's useful to have, just saying. I'm also not a nudist - please, keep wearing clothes. Bathing is natural based on every animal ever does this in some form or another.
Because love is a cheap trick played by nature to ensure reproduction, it's not the perfect emotion people want to believe it is. But I guess that's a whole other debate that would be off topic here lol
Tbh, I wonder if love really exists and if it isn't just combination of lust, desire and just getting along well lolThat's a load of bullshit. lol.
Because love is a cheap trick played by nature to ensure reproduction, it's not the perfect emotion people want to believe it is. But I guess that's a whole other debate that would be off topic here lolI've come to believe love is different for everyone else. Everyone has their own definition of it. For me, love is a colossal amount of affection and attachment for someone. Which I've been through times before, and am currently in right now.
Never take a post about love seriously from anyone on the internet, ever.I thought what we had was true ;9
Never take a post about love seriously from anyone on the internet, ever.Really, we'll always love you with all over our hearts.
Never take a post about love seriously from anyone on the internet, ever.
The rule I use in these situations is "never take a post about love seriously from a person with an anime avatar, since it's most likely skewed it some way".:justrealizedtezstillhasconananimeavatar:
Which is why I won't say anything else. :V