Conspiracy theories - What do you make of them ?

No, that just states that the CIA were breaking laws.

The NAU union would be terrible.
It would ruin the USA, Canada and Mexico...Mexico is till third world in some parts, and the currency is so different in all three of tne countries, it would set the balance of the continent off.
If it does happen, thank god non of the Central American countries would be involved, that would really ruin it.

"Some parts"?

Yeah, the parts with people in them.

The NAU union would be terrible.

Much like the EU... but it still has its strong points.

Somehow I imagine the NAU would be a bit different than the EU.
...and pointless.

It's about numbers and safety within those numbers, if we unify the West, taking the East will be much easier... At least that's what I think the hidden agenda is.

It's about numbers and safety within those numbers, if we unify the West, taking the East will be much easier... At least that's what I think the hidden agenda is.

Yeah, it's not like annexing a third world nation with all sorts of problems would hurt the United States in any way. "Strength in numbers" is a maxim more nations should adopt - just look at China and India. Clearly the only way up for a nation in the new millenium is to have a large, uneducated population which is always precariously close to the edge of famine.

It's about numbers and safety within those numbers, if we unify the West, taking the East will be much easier... At least that's what I think the hidden agenda is.

Yeah, it's not like annexing a third world nation with all sorts of problems would hurt the United States in any way. "Strength in numbers" is a maxim more nations should adopt - just look at China and India. Clearly the only way up for a nation in the new millenium is to have a large, uneducated population which is always precariously close to the edge of famine.

What we really need is quality over quantity. Sure we may have lots of people but most of them are totally worthless and would die over night if they had to live outside. What we need is rigorous eugenics with long term vision while the Chinese shore up their numbers of worthless peasents and get the pasifying crowd revolts they are constructing for themselves.

I get nervous how you guys are so obsessive over eugenics.

What we really need is quality over quantity. Sure we may have lots of people but most of them are totally worthless and would die over night if they had to live outside. What we need is rigorous eugenics with long term vision while the Chinese shore up their numbers of worthless peasants and get the pacifying crowd revolts they are constructing for themselves.

(typos fixed!)

Eugenics is not the answer. Humans contain such little genetic variation compared to other animals. The development rate of humans is too long, it takes six years after birth of a human child to be at the same age of development as most other newborn animals, approximately thirteen to sixteen years on average after birth to become capable of reproduction, and are not truly adults until about 20 or 22 years after birth. This also denies one of the most basic facts of humans: intelligence. It means that the only way to succeed is superior genetics, which isn't the case. Superior genetics is a fallacy. They can fail, the brain can develop poorly--and a worthless brain harbors a worthless body (and let me tell you, I've met some worthless bodies). Genetic diseases and most other diseases are mutable. You may be able to weed the lot out, but most bacteria and viruses will adapt to new conditions.

The intellectual flexibility of humans is what makes nations conquer other nations. Nations succeed because they possess resources and knowledge to use, greater transmission of information, and so on. The people in those nations that succeed desire an explanation for their power. It sounds better when they say it was predetermined: God/Allah/Flying Spaghetti Monster favors us, we are led by the descendant of the sun god, we have superior genetics.

Do you know why the US military is one of the best in the world? It's not genetic screening and gene therapy and eugenics at play. It's hardcore training. While the best equipment and technology is available, so is the training to use it. The same goes for the Israeli Air Force, one of the best trained air forces in the world; their pilots are hands-down better than American pilots.

The cost is also a terrible price to pay. You limit population growth to an extreme. The cost also, for research of genetics and disposal of "genetically inferior specimens", is outsanding. It's just damn cheaper to just to education them then work is to they pop out of the vagoo doing calculus. You also pay a humanitarian price. People, no matter how much propaganda is given to them, may and will ultimately reject it.

It would save us money when we eliminate the retarded, chronically ill, chronically criminal, and parasitic to not have the great burden of carrying worthless people. It won't be so alldominating as the anti propaganda tells. In any case, once the obvious human waste has been removed people may take a greater interest in improving themselves when there is the possibility they could be found unfit and die if they are lazy and weak (nature used to do this for us, but now greater technology means we have to look after the quallity of our own populations) more people prove themselves to not be weeds then there is less weeding that has to be done. Quality improves all around and those things you pointed out makes nations great can be done more and more efficiently without the riff raff gumming up the works.

As for the idea that there is little genetic variation between humans, this is true. However, compare a Nordic or a Japanese to an aboriginal and an autistic. Not much of a difference genetically, but the effects of just those small differences make a huge difference.

Aboriginals are inferior? Also, I have numerous autistic (or at least "autistic") acquaintances who contribute quite a bit to society.
Also lol @ picking Nordic and Japanese as examples.

I don't like Japanese myself, but fetishistic and degenerate as they are, they rank higher than whites on that IQ scale. Blah... Yes, aboriginals are more of "niggers" than the true africans, or african americans in every sense of the word, pretty sick really. For autistics, I have an autistic cousin and he's fine. I'm not saying they're bad people, but do you really want them, or him, to vote your next leader in? Not if you want to survive.

Well, humans are basically conspiracy loving creatures. We all love scandals, don't we?

I don't like Japanese myself, but fetishistic and degenerate as they are, they rank higher than whites on that IQ scale. Blah... Yes, aboriginals are more of "niggers" than the true africans, or african americans in every sense of the word, pretty sick really. For autistics, I have an autistic cousin and he's fine. I'm not saying they're bad people, but do you really want them, or him, to vote your next leader in? Not if you want to survive.

I guess you do have a point there.

Here watch this... It's about the changes occuring in Europe and England:- http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2007/020507Face.htm

IM A RAGING HOMOSEXUAL

Dunno if this has been linked already, but:

http://www.carpenoctem.tv/cons/

Found this pretty useful.

The CSA is still alive and well, just waiting for someone like Clinton to be elected so she won't stop the secession.
www.confederatestatesofamerica.org

*ahem* Illuminati *cough*

Sorry to re-dig this topic up, but it seems that this is all happening now.

http://uk.youtube.com/2012TNWO

Sorry to re-dig this topic up, but it seems that this is all happening now.

http://uk.youtube.com/2012TNWO

I like conspiracy theories, but that video was the absolute most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. Why not just become a Scientologist while you're at it? People are so fucking lame sometimes.

Yeah the History one does seem odd... It's the Disclosure of the Flag that looks real:- http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=-tEDwlQxUBQ