Screw it, I'll try this.

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*****
Rep:
Level 87
Unoriginal text here.
Most of you guys will just ignore my pms or stop responding to my threads after the first post. You guys just mutually decided to cut me off because you assume that I'll have nothing good to say. No, don't deny it.

So, that being said, I'm looking for a moderator who will listen if I send you a PM. Anski just randomly started hating me one day, so he won't respond. Malson don't respond no more. Roph always takes action or does something to help, but he never writes back. He's a man of mystery. I haven't seen Nouman in ages, and I don't know if he'll respond either. Dr_Sword is on an anti-Animefan crusade right now, so he won't respond, and if he does, it'll just be some jumbled compilation of different ways of saying "fag".

So is there a moderator out there who's willing to be... y'know, a moderator? Anybody who I can send my PM to?

No, my PM is not some ventfest of pissed offness. I want to know why certain posts didn't qualify as flames. All I'll do is forward some posts and type up a reason why I think the post does qualify as a flame.

And to clarify, no, I don't give a FUCK about people expressing your opinion. I believe everybody has a right to their opinion, so QUIT QUIT QUIT putting words in my mouth by saying that I'm saying that I want people to stop posting opinions that contradict mine, because I DON'T! I have NO issue with contradicting opinions. My issue is with people who are hostile and rude while they post their opinion. You don't NEED to call me fag to get your point across.

That being said, I want to CALMLY ask why certain posts were not deleted, and I'm wondering which one of you moderators is willing to be helpful and courteous to a fellow member. I've already listed the guys I can write off. Who do we have left?

If you're a moderator and you're willing to moderate something, please post your name in this thread so I know who's still safe to message.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2008, 07:52:03 AM by Fanatical About Anime »

*
Avatar Gallery, Lol
Rep:
Level 88
Secret Santa 2013 ParticipantFor taking arms in the name of your breakfast.Secret Santa 2012 ParticipantSilver - GIAW 10Silver - GIAW 92011 Biggest Drama WhoreBronze - GIAW HalloweenGold - Game In A Week VII
:tinysmile:

*
Meet me in the middle
Rep:
Level 89
or left of the dial.
For frequently finding and reporting spam and spam botsSecret Santa 2012 Participant

*
Avatar Gallery, Lol
Rep:
Level 88
Secret Santa 2013 ParticipantFor taking arms in the name of your breakfast.Secret Santa 2012 ParticipantSilver - GIAW 10Silver - GIAW 92011 Biggest Drama WhoreBronze - GIAW HalloweenGold - Game In A Week VII
Not fuckin' likely
:tinysmile:

*
Meet me in the middle
Rep:
Level 89
or left of the dial.
For frequently finding and reporting spam and spam botsSecret Santa 2012 Participant
Most of you guys will just ignore my pms or stop responding to my threads after the first post. You guys just mutually decided to cut me off because you assume that I'll have nothing good to say. No, don't deny it.

So, that being said, I'm looking for a moderator who will listen if I send you a PM. Anski just randomly started hating me one day, so he won't respond. Malson don't respond no more. Roph always takes action or does something to help, but he never writes back. He's a man of mystery. I haven't seen Nouman in ages, and I don't know if he'll respond either. Dr_Sword is on an anti-Animefan crusade right now, so he won't respond, and if he does, it'll just be some jumbled compilation of different ways of saying "fag".

So is there a moderator out there who's willing to be... y'know, a moderator? Anybody who I can send my PM to?

No, my PM is not some ventfest of pissed offness. I want to know why certain posts didn't qualify as flames. All I'll do is forward some posts and type up a reason why I think the post does qualify as a flame.

And to clarify, no, I don't give a FUCK about people expressing your opinion. I believe everybody has a right to their opinion, so QUIT QUIT QUIT putting words in my mouth by saying that I'm saying that I want people to stop posting opinions that contradict mine, because I DON'T! I have NO issue with contradicting opinions. My issue is with people who are hostile and rude while they post their opinion. You don't NEED to call me fag to get your point across.

That being said, I want to CALMLY ask why certain posts were not deleted, and I'm wondering which one of you moderators is willing to be helpful and courteous to a fellow member. I've already listed the guys I can write off. Who do we have left?

If you're a moderator and you're willing to moderate something, please post your name in this thread so I know who's still safe to message.

Only reason they are on this 'crusade', as you call it, is because of your attitude and your general way of acting. I know that you have been trying to improve (or at the very least faked it.) but obviously isn't working. 50+ thread isn't going to change anything. Get a new tactic, m'kay?

*****
Rep:
Level 87
Unoriginal text here.
Dr_Sword is on a crusade because he doesn't agree with my method to defend net neutrality, and he thinks I'm planning to take on the military for some reason. He also thinks that there's some magic power keeping bullets from doing any damage when they hit a person's cheek or nose.

Although, my actual plan is to take hostages, but that's only if I get enough people to help and if the idea of just protesting doesn't work, and I'll only even bother to do THAT if absolutely NO ISPs provide net neutrality.

So honestly, he's just on a crusade of posting overly sarcastic replies and even a thread where he uses his false vision of what my plan is for example, or exaggerates what my plan is.

Comprende?

*
You zetta sons of digits.
Rep:
Level 90
SMEEEEE HEEEEEE
Although, my actual plan is to take hostages, but that's only if I get enough people to help and if the idea of just protesting doesn't work, and I'll only even bother to do THAT if absolutely NO ISPs provide net neutrality.

So honestly, he's just on a crusade of posting overly sarcastic replies and even a thread where he uses his false vision of what my plan is for example, or exaggerates what my plan is.

Comprende?

YOU SAY THINGS LIKE THIS AND YOU MOAN WHEN WE INSULT YOU.

*****
Rep:
Level 87
Unoriginal text here.
Although, my actual plan is to take hostages, but that's only if I get enough people to help and if the idea of just protesting doesn't work, and I'll only even bother to do THAT if absolutely NO ISPs provide net neutrality.

So honestly, he's just on a crusade of posting overly sarcastic replies and even a thread where he uses his false vision of what my plan is for example, or exaggerates what my plan is.

Comprende?

YOU SAY THINGS LIKE THIS AND YOU MOAN WHEN WE INSULT YOU.
You don't need to insult me. You can say "I don't think your plan will work" without calling me stupid or a fag.
And that's once again subjective.

*
Avatar Gallery, Lol
Rep:
Level 88
Secret Santa 2013 ParticipantFor taking arms in the name of your breakfast.Secret Santa 2012 ParticipantSilver - GIAW 10Silver - GIAW 92011 Biggest Drama WhoreBronze - GIAW HalloweenGold - Game In A Week VII
you want to take hostages, you are clearly more warped than a starfleet officer gone surface side.
:tinysmile:

*****
Rep:
Level 87
Unoriginal text here.
you want to take hostages, you are clearly more warped than a starfleet officer gone surface side.
And yet you conveniently left out the factor that with hostages taken, there will be no way any of them will get hurt if the government simply makes net neutrality REQUIRED and signs a document that pardons us for our hostage-taking.

Those demands aren't hard to fulfill, and they'll have no choice but to fulfill them, or someone innocent will die. That's the ultimate leverage, so there's no way they're going to risk an innocent human life.

*
Meet me in the middle
Rep:
Level 89
or left of the dial.
For frequently finding and reporting spam and spam botsSecret Santa 2012 Participant
Although, my actual plan is to take hostages, but that's only if I get enough people to help and if the idea of just protesting doesn't work, and I'll only even bother to do THAT if absolutely NO ISPs provide net neutrality.

So honestly, he's just on a crusade of posting overly sarcastic replies and even a thread where he uses his false vision of what my plan is for example, or exaggerates what my plan is.

Comprende?

YOU SAY THINGS LIKE THIS AND YOU MOAN WHEN WE INSULT YOU.
You don't need to insult me. You can say "I don't think your plan will work" without calling me stupid or a fag.
And that's once again subjective.

He did not call you stupid and/or a fag.

*****
Rep:
Level 87
Unoriginal text here.
Although, my actual plan is to take hostages, but that's only if I get enough people to help and if the idea of just protesting doesn't work, and I'll only even bother to do THAT if absolutely NO ISPs provide net neutrality.

So honestly, he's just on a crusade of posting overly sarcastic replies and even a thread where he uses his false vision of what my plan is for example, or exaggerates what my plan is.

Comprende?

YOU SAY THINGS LIKE THIS AND YOU MOAN WHEN WE INSULT YOU.
You don't need to insult me. You can say "I don't think your plan will work" without calling me stupid or a fag.
And that's once again subjective.

He did not call you stupid and/or a fag.
I wasn't referring to that post. I was talking about in general. I was being hypothetical. By "you", I didn't mean him specifically, and I didn't mean that exact post.

*
You zetta sons of digits.
Rep:
Level 90
SMEEEEE HEEEEEE
Oh god.

Animefan this has to stop.

If you take hostages for ANYTHING, you will go to prison, no one will care for what you did, they will just see a maniac who uses the PC too much.

Do you not realise that we insult you as your methods make you sounds exactally how old you are.


'If i cant watch my fetish without it stopping me pee ill kill myself'

'I did some shit on a site, will they catch me if they do ill kill myself'

'People who dont employ 'cus i cant pee im going to get an army and make them hire me'

*
Rep:
Level 97
Definitely better than Hitler.
2014 Best Musician2014 Best IRC Chatterbox2013 Funniest Member2013 Best Use of Avatar and Signature Space2013 Best Musician2013 King of RMRKFor the great victory in the Breakfast War.2012 Best Username2012 Best MusicianFor frequent good quality Wiki writing [citation needed]Most entertaining member on the IRC2011 Funniest Member2011 Best Musician2010 Most Missed Member
you want to take hostages, you are clearly more warped than a starfleet officer gone surface side.
And yet you conveniently left out the factor that with hostages taken, there will be no way any of them will get hurt if the government simply makes net neutrality REQUIRED and signs a document that pardons us for our hostage-taking.

Those demands aren't hard to fulfill, and they'll have no choice but to fulfill them, or someone innocent will die. That's the ultimate leverage, so there's no way they're going to risk an innocent human life.

Stupid fgt
:tinysmile:

*
Avatar Gallery, Lol
Rep:
Level 88
Secret Santa 2013 ParticipantFor taking arms in the name of your breakfast.Secret Santa 2012 ParticipantSilver - GIAW 10Silver - GIAW 92011 Biggest Drama WhoreBronze - GIAW HalloweenGold - Game In A Week VII
i'd like to see a lone nerd take on a shit ton of SWAT. Hell your hostages would take you out before the cops were even alerted. have fun getting lynched crazy, see you on cnn in a body bag.
:tinysmile:

*****
Rep:
Level 87
Unoriginal text here.
you want to take hostages, you are clearly more warped than a starfleet officer gone surface side.
And yet you conveniently left out the factor that with hostages taken, there will be no way any of them will get hurt if the government simply makes net neutrality REQUIRED and signs a document that pardons us for our hostage-taking.

Those demands aren't hard to fulfill, and they'll have no choice but to fulfill them, or someone innocent will die. That's the ultimate leverage, so there's no way they're going to risk an innocent human life.

Stupid fgt
So are you saying that if I said "If any SWAT team members enter the building, I'm killing a hostage", they would enter anyway, in spite of the fact that an innocent person would die if they did?

*
You zetta sons of digits.
Rep:
Level 90
SMEEEEE HEEEEEE
you want to take hostages, you are clearly more warped than a starfleet officer gone surface side.
And yet you conveniently left out the factor that with hostages taken, there will be no way any of them will get hurt if the government simply makes net neutrality REQUIRED and signs a document that pardons us for our hostage-taking.

Those demands aren't hard to fulfill, and they'll have no choice but to fulfill them, or someone innocent will die. That's the ultimate leverage, so there's no way they're going to risk an innocent human life.

Stupid fgt
So are you saying that if I said "If any SWAT team members enter the building, I'm killing a hostage", they would enter anyway, in spite of the fact that an innocent person would die if they did?

Ever heard of a snipers.

*
Avatar Gallery, Lol
Rep:
Level 88
Secret Santa 2013 ParticipantFor taking arms in the name of your breakfast.Secret Santa 2012 ParticipantSilver - GIAW 10Silver - GIAW 92011 Biggest Drama WhoreBronze - GIAW HalloweenGold - Game In A Week VII
ever heard of dynamic entry you wouldn't know they were there until you were already bleeding out. I bet he'd take the hostages with a stainless steel katana made in china in a factory.
:tinysmile:

*****
Rep:
Level 87
Unoriginal text here.
ever heard of dynamic entry you wouldn't know they were there until you were already bleeding out. I bet he'd take the hostages with a stainless steel katana made in china in a factory.
Once again, you're just trying to piss me off.
Back up into a brick wall. They can't dynamically enter through that. There's plenty of other ways to avoid dynamic entry as well, and like I said, I wouldn't do it alone. They can't possibly kill every one of us at once.

*
Rep:
Level 97
Definitely better than Hitler.
2014 Best Musician2014 Best IRC Chatterbox2013 Funniest Member2013 Best Use of Avatar and Signature Space2013 Best Musician2013 King of RMRKFor the great victory in the Breakfast War.2012 Best Username2012 Best MusicianFor frequent good quality Wiki writing [citation needed]Most entertaining member on the IRC2011 Funniest Member2011 Best Musician2010 Most Missed Member
you want to take hostages, you are clearly more warped than a starfleet officer gone surface side.
And yet you conveniently left out the factor that with hostages taken, there will be no way any of them will get hurt if the government simply makes net neutrality REQUIRED and signs a document that pardons us for our hostage-taking.

Those demands aren't hard to fulfill, and they'll have no choice but to fulfill them, or someone innocent will die. That's the ultimate leverage, so there's no way they're going to risk an innocent human life.

Stupid fgt
So are you saying that if I said "If any SWAT team members enter the building, I'm killing a hostage", they would enter anyway, in spite of the fact that an innocent person would die if they did?

No, actually I was calling you a stupid faggot. But if you did say that, then if they had to they would sacrifice a life. Are you really going to do this someday? Because I'm looking forward to you dying.
:tinysmile:

*
You zetta sons of digits.
Rep:
Level 90
SMEEEEE HEEEEEE
ever heard of dynamic entry you wouldn't know they were there until you were already bleeding out. I bet he'd take the hostages with a stainless steel katana made in china in a factory.
Once again, you're just trying to piss me off.
Back up into a brick wall. They can't dynamically enter through that. There's plenty of other ways to avoid dynamic entry as well, and like I said, I wouldn't do it alone. They can't possibly kill every one of us at once.

Yes they can?

C4.

Animefan stop whore atention we dont care about your plans, go play some more CoD4 and take ideas from that.

*****
Rep:
Level 87
Unoriginal text here.
ever heard of dynamic entry you wouldn't know they were there until you were already bleeding out. I bet he'd take the hostages with a stainless steel katana made in china in a factory.
Once again, you're just trying to piss me off.
Back up into a brick wall. They can't dynamically enter through that. There's plenty of other ways to avoid dynamic entry as well, and like I said, I wouldn't do it alone. They can't possibly kill every one of us at once.

Yes they can?

C4.

Animefan stop whore atention we dont care about your plans, go play some more CoD4 and take ideas from that.
The C4 would kill the hostages too you dolt. =_=
Seriously, if America were willing to let innocent people die just so they could get a chance to flex their rifle fingers, I'm pretty sure people would lose faith in the American government. That kind of raw display of power and disregard for innocent bystanders would probably be more than enough to incite another revolution.

*
You zetta sons of digits.
Rep:
Level 90
SMEEEEE HEEEEEE
Er what? a small amount would be enough to get through the wall and shoot your ass.

And lol like people already havent lost faith in it.


:o

You called me an idiot REPORTED

*
Avatar Gallery, Lol
Rep:
Level 88
Secret Santa 2013 ParticipantFor taking arms in the name of your breakfast.Secret Santa 2012 ParticipantSilver - GIAW 10Silver - GIAW 92011 Biggest Drama WhoreBronze - GIAW HalloweenGold - Game In A Week VII
They can't possibly kill every one of us at once.
all two of you?

I am so sick of your I AM AN ANARCHIST WHO LIVES IN A NICE HOUSE AND SURFS THE NET ALL DAY bullshit.
:tinysmile:

*
Meet me in the middle
Rep:
Level 89
or left of the dial.
For frequently finding and reporting spam and spam botsSecret Santa 2012 Participant
Animefan the army would come and swarm your shit with tanks, jeeps, big guns and a fuckton of soldiers.